Friday, August 30, 2019

Bathory and the Scandinavian Metal Attack PT II: Lords of Chaos

[These headlines are here to help people find the page]

Bathory documentary

Lords of Chaos Movie

Pelle Ohlin

"I used to be the ringleader of Bathory; now Bathory's my master. It's like an actor doing "Hamlet."... I'm just the actor or the civil servant of the monster Bathory...It's a role I play" - Quorthon

THE BATHORY HEAVY SOUND SIGNING

According to Bathory.nu, the above picture was taken May 29th, 1987 just before Bathory's debut public appearance at Heavy Sound Record Store in Stockholm, Sweden. Quorthon [who couldn't seem to keep his fingers out of his mouth that day] and a man referred to as "Vvornth" were drinking glasses of vodka, and apparently piss drunk upon stumbling out the door to meet and greet with fans just down the street.

"by the time we arrived, we were pretty drunk. If I didn't have the pictures to prove that I was there and that in-store actually happened, I wouldn't remember ever going there doing that in-store." - Quorthon, Bathory.nu

One of the many Bathory fans who showed up to meet "the band" was Pelle "Dead" Ohlin, who was not yet in Mayhem [although he was in underground Swedish band, Morbid]. This is obviously a very interesting historic moment for followers of early Scandinavian Black Metal, who are notoriously concerned with history and timeline. Despite this fact, Quorthon never seems to mention his meeting with Pelle anywhere, even when he does take the time to speak about this event. There is footage online of it, and supposedly Pelle is in it briefly, and can be heard instructing Quorthon to sign "to Dead." Although the footage is very low quality, a picture was also taken that day, proving Dead was there. We'll call this "The Heavy Sound Picture."

On the right is Quorthon [fingers in his mouth again], Pelle in the middle, and on the left is the same person from the black and white photo at the top of the page. If you look for this picture online, many people have this man listed as "Jonas Åkerlund." Although we know Åkerlund was the drummer for Bathory very early on, he left before the first album was recorded. So how could this be him if he had left the band years before? On the Bathory.nu site, this guy is called Vvornth and Pålle in separate areas. Vvornth is a title Bathory didn't start using for another year and "Pålle" seems to be Swedish for Paul, or Paul Lundburg - who is listed as drummer sometimes on "Under the Sign..." [his name appears nowhere on my copy] - Boss has also stated that Quorthon played the drums on that album and "a Paul Lundbug" was never in the studio. Perhaps Jonas Åkerlund was the photographer, and that is why his name gets associated with this image and the Heavy Sound session, despite not appearing in it? Apparently there is an issue of Sweden Rock magazine which clears this up, but it was sold out last I checked and I gave up trying to find it. There is also a Bathory book in the works currently which may shed more light on this topic in the future.

CONNECTIONS OF NOTE

Though Åkerlund left Bathory years before the Heavy Sound signing, he did direct Dead in his first video that same year, "Bewitched," by Candlemass. It is interesting to note that Dead met both Quorthon and Åkerlund the same year - presumably under completely different circumstances, and both occasions were filmed! This was also, as far as we know, the very beginning of Åkerlund's huge career in the film/entertainment industry.

"The first really big deal we got was with Music for Nations/Under one Flag and then we wrote a 3 year contract with them and released "Under the Sign of the Black Mark" - Quorthon

"Music for Nations is a British independent record label focusing mainly on rock and metal. It was a subsidiary of the larger label distributor Zomba Records, which was a division of BMG and later Sony Music Entertainment." - WIKI

Most people who have listened to a lot of 80s Thrash and Death Metal are familiar with company names like Music for Nations, Megaforce, Combat Records, Important, Noise, etc...Everything from Venom to Metallica, Bathory, Slayer, Celtic Frost, Megadeth, Exodus, you name it - something in your cassette collection has one or more of these names on it. These companies were all somehow connected in 1987.

"Combat Records was the "in house" heavy metal label for the independent powerhouse distributor Important Record Distributors. Important had several offices in the United States that promoted and sold Combat's releases. Important Records was also home to Megaforce Records in the mid-1980s...In mid-1986, the Noise label signed a deal with Combat to distribute records in the US... Neat also signed with Combat...The label had distribution deals with Music for Nations and Under One Flag for European releases of their catalog..." - WIKI

The Bathory album being promoted in 1987 was "Under the Sign of the Black Mark." This was put out by Under One Flag, which was a sub-label of Music for Nations, based out of England. Coincidentally, the album from which Candlemass' song "Bewitched" comes from, "Nightfall," was also put out on a sub-label of Music for Nations [Axis]. I assume Music for Nations/Axis paid for the Candlemass video, as they were very expensive to make in those days. This means there was a not so distant industry connection between Åkerlund and Bathory at that time - the very same year both Quorthon and Åkerlund met Dead - who sort of drifts right in between them just before moving to Norway, immediately assuming the role of most iconic singer in 2nd wave Black Metal history. As if a "satanic torch" was handed off to Dead by Quorthon - who is more or less the icon of first wave Scandinavian Black Metal.

If you recall the beginning of the "Bewitched" video, you may remember Dead and other extras carrying a coffin to a burial. As they lower the coffin into the grave, Messiah bursts out, smoke all around, and we enjoy one of the great campy moments in Metal music video history. Earlier that same year, 1987, Dead did a show with his band Morbid, and also came out of a coffin - smoke machine on full.

[SPV GmbH (also known as Schallplatten Produktion und Vertrieb GmbH) is an independent German record label....Founded on 1 January 1984, it has slowly grown to be one of the largest independent distributors and record labels worldwide. - Wiki]

"During a gig at Birkagården [1987], a youth center in Vasastan, the band [Morbid] had decorated the stage with candles and borrowed a coffin from SPV's set stores where Uffe Cederlund's dad worked. Pelle recorded the intro of the horror movie "Evil Dead" on repeat and crawls out of the coffin with smoke machines at full power." - Blod Eld Död [Blood Fire Death: A Swedish metal story]

For a singer to emerge from a coffin on stage was far from common, but not unprecedented. Artists as varied as Kind Diamond and Screaming Jay Hawkins have utilized coffins in their stage act. But it is hard not to consider that Dead, who was accepted into art school just before he died, may have had an influence on Jonas Åkerlund during the making of his Candlemass video. If so, this would indicate that Dead had a larger role in the video than just being a mere "extra," and therefore, would indicate he had a closer working relationship with Åkerlund than might have been previously assumed.

[Messiah Marcolin, bursting out of a coffin near the beginning of Candlemass' 1987 "Bewitched" video]

Another interesting thing about the above quote, is that the coffin was borrowed from SPV, due to the fact Uffe Cederlund's dad worked for them. [Uffe Cederlund helped form Nihilist/Entombed in 1987] Quorthon's father, Borje "Boss" Forsberg "took care of the exclusive distribution of SPV in Sweden and thus also came into contact with Noise International," according to his ex wife Klaudia. If you read my first blog on Bathory, you may recall the tour idea involving Noise Records around this time, which never panned out. You think this connection to SPV had something to do with that idea? I would imagine so. It would appear then that Morbid had an industry connection to Bathory in 1987, via their guitar player Uffe "Napolean Pukes" Cederlund. Seems likely that Boss probably knew, or may even have worked with Uffe's father, while Uffe was in a band with Dead. Dead was invited back to Bathorycorp after the heavy sound signing. Were there business reasons for this? We'll get into that in a moment.

While Dead and other extras are carrying the coffin in the beginning of the Candlemass video, there is a somber intro tune playing. It may sound familiar, because it was taken from a classical piece called "Marche Funebre" [Funeral March] written by Frédéric Chopin. This same musical piece is also borrowed by Quorthon during his solo on the song "A Call from the Grave," [at about 2:26] released that same year. However, Quorthon's album came out before Candlemass's. Did Candlemass copy Bathory's idea? Seems rather coincidental that they would both get released by the same parent label AND choose to lift the exact same classical piece the same year! I don't know what this means, but it does hint at more connections behind the scenes between these bands.

"Nightfall" was recorded at Sweden's Thunderload studios, the same studio Dead's band at the time, Morbid, would record their most famous "December Moon" demo that same year. This studio was owned by members of Heavy Load, so I suppose it was popular. But that's 2 connections Dead had to Candlemass in the same year, if you also count the video.

Was Dead this misanthropic "inhuman" creature who just stumbled into places where the most important individuals in Scandinavia's late 80s extreme metal history were, or is this all evidence of a young and very driven musician on a mission? Clearly, Sweden's underground Metal scene was a small world in the late 80s, but I doubt Dead went from rubbing elbows with the most important people in that scene, to Norway's most respected underground Metal band - without a very intentional effort. This was the dawn of some very important moments in extreme Scandinavian Metal history. Fans clearly saw the "star quality" in Dead, I am sure some people in the industry did as well, people like Quorthon's father Boss.

[Jack Kilmer and Jonas Åkerlund on Jonesy's Jukebox promoting the film "Lords of Chaos."]

"Jonas actually knew a lot of - knows a lot of the guys, he knew my character [in the film]..Dead and…there’s a photo actually of them hanging out in Sweden." - Jack Kilmer

Kilmer's quote above indicates that Åkerlund appears in a photo with Dead during a casual moment, as "Hanging out in Sweden" doesn't sound like a working environment to me. Did Åkerlund have some sort of relationship with Dead outside the Candlemass music video, which he has never spoken about publicly? Did Åkerlund play the role of Vvornth for a short time after he already quit Bathory, without officially informing the public? Perhaps Kilmer was mistaken, but Åkerlund doesn't correct him. In fact he says nothing and just stares directly at him stone faced for a moment [see image above, taken just after Kilmer mentions Åkerlund's relation to Dead]

The host of this interview is Steve "Jonesy" Jones, formally of the UK punk band "Sex Pistols." [a band which featured Sid Vicious, like Dead, very self destructive and also died young] While Åkerlund is staring silently at Kilmer, Jonesy says, "Jonas was probably involved with the one who got killed..." Kilmer then plays along, and says "I've had my suspicions!" Rather than respond directly to Kilmer or Jonesy's comments, Åkerlund finally says:

"I never burned a church."

None of that short bit of dialogue makes any sense at all continuity-wise. They were talking about Dead one second, Jonesy then jokes that Åkerlund may have been involved with "the one who got killed" [which makes no sense because Dead wasn't "killed," he committed suicide] then the next second Åkerlund is saying he never burned a church, even though nobody suggested or even joked that he did! I can only conclude that Åkerlund was uncomfortable with the line of topic and, with the help of Jonesy, changed the subject abruptly with a joke which made no sense from the outside. Kilmer made it clear enough, Åkerlund knew Dead and there is a picture of them in a casual situation backing up his claim [according to him]. Why is Åkerlund so hesitant to discuss details about the nature of his relationship to Dead here? He is supposed to be promoting his film in this segment, which focuses on Mayhem during the time Dead was in it. One would think he would use this as an opportunity to demonstrate his personal connection to the story, which seems oddly elusive when you really put it under a microscope. This matters because if he didn't have much of a personal attachment to the story or the characters, what drove him to make the film?

Jonesy: "So do you like that kind of music personally?"
Åkerlund: "Ummm...I used to. A lot. And in making this movie I Kinda like...re-discovered it for myself...and realized that it's, really good."

Åkerlund gets visibly nervous answering this question, indicated by the stuttering and slowness of his response. If he likes the music, why does he stutter and squirm trying to state his opinion about it? He first says he "used to" like it. That's "past tense." That means, "I don't really like it anymore, but I used to" Then he says he "re-discovered it" while making the film. If he had to "re-discover" Nordic Black Metal AFTER he already started making the film, in order to finally "realize" that it's really good, doesn't that mean he never thought it was "really good" before that? What was motivating him when he decided to make the film, before this "post re-discovery realization" of his? Perhaps he was confident Rory Kulkin would make an Oscar winning "Euronymous?" Doubtful. So if Åkerlund wasn't into the music, why the hell did he start making the film? His personal connection to the story has been elusive as well, so the question just keeps getting louder here. Money doesn't appear to be the reason either, which we will see later.

[A drawing Dead made, referencing the dead rodent he left at Bathorycorp, just after the Heavy Sound signing.]

THE DEAD RODENT THING

"The pictures of Dead and Bathory was in connection with a record signing they were having. They actually ended up getting along pretty fine. Dead and I were invited the day after to Elektra, where Boss worked. He wasn't there, apparently a bullshit trip." - Dr Schitz, Morbid

"Quorthon...was very impressed by Dead's own Bathory drawing on the back of his jacket and asked him to come down to the record company the following monday to have it photographed" [Slayer Magazine]

Apparently, Quorthon liked Dead enough to invite him and Dr Schitz back to Bathorycorp the following day. But according to Dr Schitz, Boss wasn't there and he makes no mention of Quorthon. Perhaps Quorthon was just really drunk and forgot he invited them?

"But we left a bag with the demo and a crucified mouse on a cross in the fancy reception. When we later called to check out what he thought about the tape, he freaked out and told us that we were the sickest people that he'd ever met." - Dr Schitz, Morbid

"In the date of 1/6 - 87 me and Schitzo (ass bass of Morbid) walked up to Elektra and leave there rehearsal tape and upside down cross with a nailed gun pig head on it and tied eyes with spikes through the eyes!...We leave it to the receptionist girl and told her to leave it to Ace Forsberg of Bathory. A few days later we called Borje (the Boss on the records Quorthon's father) He liked the band but not the present. We had all took this thing too seriously he told us. But I think we'd not." - Dead, in a letter to Metalian

So far, this meeting with Bathorycorp seems as though it was completely unplanned, right? Dead got invited back because Quorthon liked the Goat painting on his back. Well, here is another version of the story which makes it sound much more pre-meditated by Dead...

"When we were at Jens' place once we wondered where Pelle was said Rille. He was in the basement and would dissect a hamster. Jens was quite upset. -I was there and should take pictures, says Nisse. But when he began to chop the poor hamster with a scalpel, I had to stop. I stood and covered my ears, it was such a horrible sound when it squeaked. He would rip it up to put it on a cross and send it to Quorthon. That was the whole thing. It was so damn disgusting. And he didn't even just send it. After a week, he submitted it at the reception of Bathory record labels and the fucking letter stank terribly. It was put into the trash right away, I can imagine." - "Blod Eld Död"

If it took a week for Dead's "hamster" [he called it a Guinea Pig, which is much larger than a hamster] to begin reeking and rotting sufficiently, this means Dead would have to have given it to Bathorycorp a week after he met Quorthon, not the next day - as recounted by him and Dr Schitz. Or, he planned to submit the dead rodent and Morbid tape a week PREVIOUS to showing up upon the steps of Bathorycorp. The reason the latter story is more odd, is because he could not have known he would be invited, unless he already had communications with Bathorycorp that are unknown to the public. Seems oddly coincidental that he would dissect a rodent specifically to submit to Bathorycorp a full week before getting unsuspectingly invited there. What really happened here?

"-The image of Quorthon split for many that day, says Nisse. He [Quorthon] came walking in sunglasses, leather jacket with a lot of metal stuff that was hanging on him. He looked too much like a rock star. Someone took a card, then he made a thumbs up. What is this? He was not bad enough! -He was like Yngwie Malmsteen says Rille. -Pelle was very disappointed, continues Nisse. He turned his attention to Norway and Mayhem pretty fast. They became the new evil gods who replaced Bathory. The disappointment of Quorthon lead to Pelle's decision to send him a letter." - "Blod Eld Död"

"SERIOUSLY we think Quorthon is a POSER like Celtic, Mefisto and them…” - Dead, in a letter he wrote to Metalian after meeting Quorthon

Again, the above quote from "Blod Eld Död" indicates specifically that it was Dead's extreme disappointment with Quorthon's character which drove him to "send him a letter." So, if the decision was made after meeting Quorthon, he could not have submitted the letter less than a week later, because that is how long he supposedly waited for the thing to start smelling! SO what was he doing at Bathorycorp the day after the Heavy Sound signing, if not submitting his package? As if this story was not obscure enough, we can't seem to get the accurate version of it! But even taking into account what we do know, one can imagine why Quorthon and Boss might have been less than eager to talk about this publicly. Åkerlund's reasons for ignoring this topic are not quite as easily understood from the outside. He was right there around this time, he had to have known about this incident by the time "Lords of Chaos" was filmed.

[Åkerlund pictured in full "Metalhead" mode, Scorpions patch in clear range]

THE SCORPIONS THING

A number of Dead's letters and interviews are available online at http://pelleohlinmorbidmayhem.blogspot.com. In one of these interviews, Dead is asked how Mayhem's short tour of Germany went. Among other things, he remarks "I guess it's typically German to have short hair, mustache, and dress like SCORPIONS." Dead was very aware of what he perceived to be "trends" and he was very fond of the word POSER. If you take the time to read his interviews and letters, you will see the word POSER pop up many times. Euronymous, on the other hand, did not use this word as much, although he obviously was very opinionated. He tended to use the word TREND more [as-in TRENDY/copycats]. But in the film "Lords of Chaos," Åkerlund creates a rather one-dimensional version of Dead, and allocates some of his traits into Euronymous' character. In fact, 2 pivotal scenes in the film reference this use of the word "poser."

When Varg first meets Euronymous in the film, he has a Scorpions patch on his jacket [which would have been highly unlikely in real life because Varg had already been in an extreme metal band, Old Funeral - whereas Scorpions were viewed as more or less Arena/Hair Metal at that point] Euronymous points to the patch and calls Varg a poser. This is what sets him off into becoming the Count Grishnackh character, culminating ultimately with him MURDERING Euronymous violently. The film then reminds the viewer why Euronymous was killed, as we hear Rory Kulkin's voice narrating over the scene where Euronymous' bloodied body is being carried off. "Poser," he calls the viewer, which is how the film ends. Obviously this is some sort of "morality lesson" the writers of the film put in, which seems to be a warning that if you live by the sword, you die by the sword. But what makes this so absurd, is that the "worst" character in the film, Varg, actually makes out the best! After some years of hard time, that is.

"He gave the impression of being extremely charismatic…which annoyed the presiding judge. There were little girls there, pale, black hair and make-up who would cry out “oh, he looked at me!” As if he was a pop star.” - LARS ERIK NYGGAARD, Journalist

[Shot of Varg, taken during the first few years of his incarceration for the murder of Euronymous]

Today Varg enjoys Manson-esque cult icon status, lives as a (armed) free man on a ranch in France, has a young wife, a bunch of kids, and seems to be living his Neo-pagan "off the grid" dream lifestyle. Meanwhile, his fanbase cannot get enough of his band, youtube videos, books, roleplaying games, or whatever else he decides to put out there for consumption. Not too bad for a guy who stabbed his friend 16 times in the back, burned a bunch of churches, and helped found a Neo-Nazi organization! [Norwegian Heathen Front]

Given that the film's "moral lesson" fades away pretty quickly upon reflection, it is interesting to consider what Åkerlund might be subtly stating about Dead's demise, given that HE was the one so fond of calling others "poser" in real life. He was also the one making statements about Scorpions in his correspondences after Mayhem's brief tour. Åkerlund clearly did his homework, and was apparently using much, if not all of the same source materials I am referencing here, and has likely read these same letters written by Dead. He simply incorporated elements of these into the film script, wherever he felt like it, regardless of accuracy. He admits these types of liberties were taken, by selling the film as "based on truth, lies, and what actually happened."

[Drawing Dead did after meeting Quorthon at the Heavy Sound signing]

The above drawing, widely available in the public domain, covers a lot of what we are discussing here.

Heavy Sound was the name of the record store where Dead met Quorthon and "Vvornth."

The guy with the sunglasses and his tongue sticking out is supposed to be Quorthon [Quorthon either has his fingers in his mouth, or is sticking his tongue out just about every time someone snaps a picture of him in that video].

There is a letter that says "poser," which I assume is the letter Dead wrote/left for Quorthon with the dead rodent and Morbid demo. "Morbid Demo Out Soon" is probably a reference to the "December Moon" demo they would record a few months later. The submission of the Morbid Demo by Dead indicates that he may have been interested in getting Morbid backed by Bathorycorp. Why else would he have submitted it? Did Boss express interest in Morbid? Not too hard to imagine, Dead did quickly establish his "star quality" in 1987, according to those who attended Morbid shows. Of all people, Boss would have wanted to keep an eye on him, as he was in the business of extreme Scandinavian Metal!

"Leg of Gehenna" refers to the guitarist in Morbid, John "Gehenna" Hagström. His leaving the band is apparently what motivated Dead to give up and move to Norway, according to the book ""Blod Eld Död." But this didn't occur until after the December Moon demo came out, which was not yet recorded when Dead drew this. So what is he trying to say about Gehenna here? His leg has been cut off, and the blood reads "Black Mark," which was the [at the time] fake label put on Bathory albums. Why is Dead associating Black Mark/Bathorycorp with his guitarist getting maimed? This is some sort of inside joke, and I don't pretend to get it. But it is interesting considering Dead's bad mouthing of Quorthon and submitting of a dead rodent to Bathorycorp. Is Dead hinting at some sort of "retaliation" against his band from Bathorycorp?

"From the Dark" is a song from Morbid's demo. The lyrics speak about having an orgasm at a funeral among other obscure things. This image also seems to suggest forces are at work in the dark, behind a door which reads "Slayer Mag." Slayer Magazine covered Bathory and Mayhem as early as, or even before most any other media sources. It's editor, Metalian, was apparently directly involved with Dead joining Mayhem [Metalian also helped finance Mayhem's first release, "Pure Fucking Armageddon"]. There is no better source for the story of "Nordic Black Metal" than the Slayer Magazine archives, as far as I know. They are certainly far better than Åkerlund's film, if one wants the most accurate depiction.

This "feelin' horny" bit brings up an interesting point. What was Dead's position sexually speaking? As far as we know, he never had a girlfriend or an interest in women at all. Yet, hints of a sexual nature are brought up in the lyrics to the song "from the Dark," also referenced in the drawing. Most reading this probably haven't considered that Dead might have had a sexual identity. He was quite young, after all, and quite disturbed obviously. But I am sure like any young man, he had a sex drive - even if it was buried deep within his "crazy" character. Here his name is buried inside the Bathory goat, inverted crucifix sticking straight up like a phallus. Is he saying Quorthon, salivating as he devours all the attention from his young male fans, was "feelin' horny" that day? Is he saying that he himself was? I think he is making some sort of veiled statement there, but I leave it to the reader to decide for themselves. Dead's nick name was also "The Goat," which is why the Morbid anthology was called "Year of the Goat." This is another possible factor associating him with the goat in the drawing.

[Daniel Ekeroth is the author of "Swedish Death Metal," his name was not in Dead's drawing, it is only there because this image was probably scanned from his book, "Swedish Death Metal."]

WHY DID ÅKERLUND MAKE A FILM ABOUT BLACK METAL?

"they [Mayhem] were never against it [the film] that’s been a rumor from day 1…especially with Euronymous parents that has the rights to the music I had to..I couldn’t make the movie without the music…all of them has been on board from day 1…Mayhem was the music I really needed" - Åkerlund, Metal Injection

"No legal issues; it’s a story that’s kind of [in the] public domain, and we have the rights to the book…we have the support of Mayhem and the music is in there…" - Åkerlund, Rolling Stone


[Lords of Chaos, the book from which Åkerlund's film takes its' name.]
[Michael Moynihan, primary author of the book "Lords of Chaos"]

[Kevin Foster, the Florida teen "ringleader" of the short lived self styled American teen terrorist group, "Lords of Chaos" from which both the book and film took their name.]

"Reached for comment, Mayhem bassist Necrobutcher – who co-founded the group with Euronymous – expressed his displeasure with the film. “This book Lords of Chaos is fucking crap and that some stupid Swedes are gonna make a movie out of it is not OK,” he tells Rolling Stone. “I will do everything I can to stop this film…. Tell the Swedes and the Hollywood people to go fuck themselves.”..The bassist also told Rolling Stone that a Norwegian company called Motion Blur has the rights to his story and that he has been spending time collaborating on a script for the film"

"Necrobutcher released an excoriating statement about the film in 2015, saying he would do everything possible stop the film. Now, two years later, he says he has heard nothing from the production. “They contacted everybody behind our backs, our crew members, all kinds of people associated with us in a very sneaky way,” he says. “It’s the wrong approach. You make a movie of a band? The first people I would contact would be the band and ask for permission to use their music. Don’t come afterwards because we won’t authorize it.”

"Attila Csihar, in a January 2019 interview, stated that the official opinion of the current Mayhem members regarding the film and its creators is a "big fuck you"; furthermore, he pointed out that the film was based on a book and only focused on Mayhem during the 1990s, not the whole black metal scene at the time. He confirmed that some Tormentor songs appear in the film, and that he himself is played by his son, Arion Csihar. Attila himself was present during the shooting of the church burning scenes." - Wiki

Based upon the above, Åkerlund seems to have lied to the press regarding the fact that Mayhem approved of the film "from day 1." It looks like the producers of the film simply obtained legal rights to Mayhem's music from Euronymous' parents, obtained legal right to use the name from Feral House [publisher of the book,] and paid off anyone else they needed to - in order to get the film made. We know Varg Vikernes completely disapproved of the idea, so unless 3 surviving members of the "De Mysteriis Dom Sathanas" recording sessions are lying, Åkerlund made this film despite the clear public disapproval of surviving members of Mayhem. Why would he do that willfully, then lie about it to the press? Just because Euronymous' parents may have authorized the use of Mayhem's early music, doesn't mean that the band Mayhem approved of it.

Attila has collaborated to a degree in the film's production. What would explain this contradiction? Well if Åkerlund and his production crew were going to make the film regardless of whether members of Mayhem were ok with it or not [which they obviously did], perhaps Mayhem would choose to participate where they could, at least to try and steer some of it in the right direction. If someone says "I'm going to make a film about YOUR band whether you like it or not. You can contribute here and there or I can just do it without any of your input." The members of Mayhem probably figured they might as well try and make what they could of those parts of the film which they were "allowed" to contribute to, rather than leave it all to Åkerlund and the producers of the film.

"I decided to do it [the film] with English-speaking actors mainly for two reasons: I wanted to make a movie for a big audience – I don’t want to make a Norwegian movie; and I wanted to make sure that I got the best actors. Being limited to Norwegian-speaking actors would have been really hard for me…" - Åkerlund, Rolling Stone

"the movie has an [pause] NC-17 rating. So, you can’t really go shopping malls. So it’s gonna be limited to certain theaters." - Åkerlund, KLOS

He didn't wanna make a Norwegian movie? Figure that one out, because I can't!

In the same KLOS interview mentioned earlier with Jonesy and Kilmer, Åkerlund states the film got an "NC-17" rating, which directly contradicts his statement about wanting to make a movie for "a big audience." How do you reach a "big audience" with an NC-17 rating? This is the most extreme rating a film can get, which naturally compromises the ability to distribute it. Kilmer didn't even know this before the interview, and reacts as if he is shocked right when Åkerlund states it. Why would a mainstream pop music video director who works with the biggest names in the business be so driven to make a film about Mayhem AGAINST the band's wishes, then totally compromise distribution by not editing it down to an R rating? Kind of defeats any commercial advantage achieved by using American actors doesn't it? What is the real reason this film was made? I found an article on vice.com which surprisingly, addresses some of the toughest points I make here. Åkerlund pretty much answers them all by being extremely vague and general, while more or less casting them aside as non-important.

[Brian "Marilyn Manson" Warner left, Jonas Åkerlund on the right, and his wife Bea in the center - playing up the 1 eyed "illuminati peak-a-boo" that is so chic these days in pop culture, her black and white checkered clothing design is part of the theme of her extremely bizarre IKEA furniture line]

"Lords of chaos is a loving, concerned, and troubled look at Black Metal" - Vice.com [producers of the film]

If you read my blog on the Le Bataclan massacre, you know that Vice Media was part of the propaganda campaign during the aftermath of that event. Given that, it shouldn't be very surprising that they would want to be part of "Lords of Chaos," a story ripe for propaganda and the pushing of political/social messages out to the extreme fringe youth of society. But to what end?

"Radicalize: cause (someone) to adopt radical positions on political or social issues." - dictionary.com

"...the burning of churches has not been a tradition for those critical of the church in Norway. But it is used by regimes in Eastern Europe and Asia. This has happened, but then the government is behind it. Supporting it or initiating it." Rolf Rasmussen [Priest], Once Upon a Time in Norway

This very interesting quote comes from a Norwegian priest who is interviewed in the documentary "Once Upon a Time in Norway." Although I can't say if the Norwegian government was ultimately behind any of the church burnings, there was a documentary made for Norwegian television which demonstrates very clearly, that the Norwegian press was encouraging radicalization of youths via sensationalism of the church burnings and deliberate promotion of Varg Vikernes/Burzum, while cooperating with Norwegian police at the same time.

"Aarseth [Euronymous] and Vikernes used the church fires in their marketing, but it didn’t yield results. Vikernes then decided to plug the record in Bergens Tidene…Their music was finally plugged and all PR is good PR" - Wiki

"we and the photographer explained that if he intended the things he had said to obtain PR for his music then he would have to explain the arson and the killing. And we would have to be able to check the information against any police evidence and any other background. Should you be speaking the truth we will show the interview. You will achieve maximum PR for your music, which is not our topic. - Finn Bjorn Tonder - BT Journalist."

"Two friends of Vikernes interviewed him and brought the interview to the newspaper, hoping they would print it" - Lords of Chaos Book

Details on exactly how a 19 year old, soon to be murderer Varg managed to so easily get the attention of a major newspaper journalist, is something that tends to get glossed over when this story is told. Who were these "friends" of his, and what connections did they have to Norwegian press?

Mr Tonder clearly states above he made a deal with Varg, that in exchange for information on the church burnings [and the "killing of a homosexual" by Bard Faust], certain unspecified Black Metal bands would get "maximum PR." What kind of journalist would promise such a thing to a 19 year old potential church burner, and possible associate of a murderer, in an extremely conservative Christian country such as Norway, especially in the early 90s? And what made Varg think he would not get in trouble for doing this interview? He was young and arrogant, yes, but I don't think he was quite THAT stupid. I believe there is more to this press coverage and Varg Vikernes than the public is aware. I don't believe Varg shares EVERYTHING about his past - much as he loves talking about himself to this day.

“Before 1992 one Norwegian Church burned a year. From 1992 to 1996 50 churches were tried to be set alight...Nearly all papers, radio, and TV stations took up the case. Everything was tied to Vikernes in jail in Bergen. The newspapers wrote about “The Count” and he appeared on TV. He was soon a national celebrity, and an internationally known Satanist...Their music was finally plugged and all PR is good PR. In interviews youngsters down to age 13 were able to say they were satanists...Instead of telling the truth, BT continued to write its own truth. After being charged, Vikernes was always in the media. He was always news. Through it all, his band became known abroad...The church burning grew after the trial. In 5 weeks 7 churches were set alight…the media had marketed Black Metal’s antichurch ideals. The marketing worked because the Satanists were dramatized and presented excitingly to people. This lead to many youths pouring into the small BM milieu… burning churches to be like Varg..." - Satan rir media

"…He loved being in the newspapers. On TV, radio, etc He wanted it. His own PR was quite astounding. I think some parts of the media made him into a guru. They should at least have realized they made him one. He enjoyed the publicity…we realized that he was made into a guru for many youths…It was decided also in Bergens Tidene that we should drop [stop printing] pictures. Drop calling him the Count…We toned it down because we knew it was leading us astray” - Finn Bjorn Tonder

In the end, not only did Varg/Burzum get the "maximum PR" promised by Mr Tonder - the entire Nordic Black Metal story as a whole received international exposure far beyond what it would have otherwise. The correlation between an increase in church burning/radicalization of youth and the press coverage has been clearly noted by the documentary. Was it the intention of Norwegian press to use the Black Metal story to radicalize Scandinavian youth and those abroad on the fringe? Was Moynihan's book merely an extension of this "Scandinavian Metal Attack," designed to further glorify disproportionately the "extreme ideologies" held by a few of it's members? Was Moynihan's reference to the Florida Teen Terrorist group in his book's title an effort to encourage an international connection between American fringe youths, and Europe's?

"Terrorism: the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion - https://www.merriam-webster.com"

"Terrorism: the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." - Oxford Dictionary

One can pick out almost any of the Nordic Black Metal documentaries out there and discover that the destruction of churches was viewed generally as a positive symbolic gesture by many Black Metal musicians and fans alike, even by those who seemed to try and take a neutral position. Even many punk rockers had to take note - this was some rebellious shit these metalers were doing! Hatred of the Christian church is something which echoes far beyond Scandinavia and even the Heavy Metal genre itself. This is the power of such a symbolic act, properly sensationalized by the media. But do metalheads really think the media would do them such a favor without a serious alterior motive behind it? What is the long term goal here? Are we really achieving progress towards our "Neo-Tolkien" fantasy world, or are we simply foot soldiers for the "evil minds that plot destruction," as referenced in Black Sabbath's "War Pigs?" What happens AFTER Christianity is crushed? Does Odin just float in on a cloud and usher in the "New Viking Age?" Don't count on it.

With all of this in mind, we again ask the question, why did Åkerlund make a film about this topic? Let's revisit the reasons he didn't:

1 - He had a personal connection to the story
“It was only like a handful of people that got a chance to see this classic moment. Most of it happened in Norway. We [Bathory] were a few years earlier. We were in Sweden. I kind of left the scene for filmmaking pretty early.” - Åkerlund, Revolver. Whatever personal connection Åkerlund may have had to the 2nd wave Black Metal scene, it is not obvious from the outside.

2 - He loved 2nd wave Black Metal Music
He told Steve Jones on KLOS that he USED to like it. A lot. Then he "rediscovered it" while he was making the film. So he started making the film during the time he wasn't really into the music? That is, before he "rediscovered it during the making of the film?" I am sure he loves Motorhead, Dio, Sabbath, Iron Maiden, and maybe even Venom - but 2nd wave black metal? Not likely considering his history and what he has said in the press. He's just saying what he needs to say in order to make himself appear credible to the public. He's an actor to a degree.

3 - He did it for the money
The film had an NC-17 rating, greatly limiting the already modest small theatre circuit it appeared in. I'm not sure what the rules are on Netflix, but I imagine NC-17 probably doesn't serve this purpose any better there. Old school fans/musicians of Black Metal generally thought it was trash, living members of Mayhem openly disapproved of it. Åkerlund works for the biggest pop stars in the music business. Whatever small profit was made from this film, if any, he did not need it.

4 - Åkerlund just did it because he thought it was a cool story to turn into a film
Then why did he lie to the press about the fact that the members of Mayhem were totally against him making it? Why would someone want to make a documentary/biographical film about a band/person who is openly against it? There is also the fact that Åkerlund originally wasn't even involved with the film!

"Lords of Chaos is based on the 1998 book of the same name. Originally, Japanese director Sion Sono was set to direct a film based on the book, with Jackson Rathbone starring as Varg Vikernes. It would have been Sono's first English-language film. The screenplay was written by Hans Fjellestad (who was earlier reported to be the film's director as well), Ryan Page, Adam Parfrey (the book's publisher), and Sono. In July 2009, Sono stated that filming (in Norway) would begin in August or September and end in December. The film was set to be released in 2010." - Wiki

Propaganda: "information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view." - Dictionary.com

ÅKERLUND'S RECENT MADONNA VIDEO

While Åkerlund's "Lords of Chaos" film seems to have a message for youths on the potential extreme fringes of society, his most recent video for Madonna has a much less ambiguous message.

[If you are on a Smartphone, you must tap on the above images in order to enlarge them at the proper resolution]

Although mass shootings have been on the rise steadily for many years now, the U.S. experienced what seemed like a sudden explosion of them this year [2019]. Within the above statistics gathered from Wikipedia, we can see a clear trend of INCREASE in mass shooting frequency.

Madonna's "Madame X" album came out June 14, 2019, almost exactly in the middle of the year. The video for "God Control" was released June 26, 2019, just about when peak hysteria surrounding mass shootings was all over the news. The timing of it couldn't have been better. In it, we see a nerdy looking white guy [who looks like he stole Ace Ventura's shirt] shooting a bunch of people reflecting MadonnaCorp's carefully cultivated aesthetic - a chic and sexy blend of multi racial, multi ethnic, sexually liberal, hedonistic lovers of life. Once the viewer is heartbroken over watching these people get shot, the video pushes the solution into your face: GUN CONTROL. In sales, it is known that if you stimulate people's emotions properly, you can make them buy anything - regardless of a product's practical use. Propaganda uses the same techniques, to sell you an IDEA - and that's exactly what this video is, propaganda.

"Gun control (or firearms regulation) is the set of laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms by civilians." - Wiki

It is a fact that gun regulations in America have increased constantly for the past 50 years or so. Are we any safer? The 2nd amendment was created in part to PROTECT Americans from total government oppression. Therefore, the "powers that be" have clear motivation to ENCOURAGE nutcases to go on shooting rampages, and certainly have the technology to do so! [research recently declassified MK Ultra documents directly on the CIA's webpage] Mass shooting sprees, with no apparent motives or apparent common causes, encourages the perception that more restrictions on gun access is the only logical solution. Just as I was typing up this blog, San Francisco used the Gilroy shooting to justify classifying the N.R.A. as a "domestic terrorist organization."

"The memory of a mass shooting that killed three at the Gilroy Garlic Festival was still fresh in nearby San Francisco when its Board of Supervisors unanimously voted last week to denounce the National Rifle Association. But the city’s leaders took their message a step further, declaring on Sept. 3 that the NRA is a “domestic terrorist organization” and discouraging the city from working with contractors or vendors with ties to the gun rights lobby." - Washington Post.com 9.10.19

An increase in mass shootings = justification for more restrictions on gun laws. It also helps perpetuate the gun debate, constantly reinforcing division between the "left" and the "right" nationwide. These same "powers that be" would have good reason to sponsor pop icons such as Madonna, because she delivers the solution of disarmament. Madonna happens to be a distant relative of Hillary Clinton, America's "left leaning" 2016 presidential candidate, who was defeated by right leaning, and National Rifle Association supporting Trump.

[Hi Madonna, nice one-eye X thingy! What could this mean?]

Obviously, MadonnaCorp is playing around with some strong symbolism on her latest album, and there is a whole lot I can comment on - but I leave it to the reader to look into that for themselves. The main point here is that Jonas Åkerlund has no problem making high budget propaganda videos, targeted towards Americans in this case. If you watch some of the other videos he's done over the years for Madonna, Beyonce and Lady Gaga - you will find they often flirt with the most divisive sexual, religious, and racial messages, almost as a rule! Åkerlund is a master at delivering these messages within a thickly cultivated environment of chic, sexy, sarcastic, youthful energy. This sexy/eye catching imagery and "fun" energy keeps audiences minds engaged on the shallowest levels of perception so that they don't bother to consider the deeper messages intellectually, and whether they are "healthy" or not. Who cares? Everyone looks pretty!

[Ok Bea Åkerlund, we see your chic little "eye of Horus" winky thing, what's your point?]

CLICK HERE FOR PART 3

CLICK HERE FOR PART 1

Here are some other popular blogs I have done, click to read.

The Darrell "Dimebag" Abbott Murder
The Chris Cornell Death
Star Wars and the Occult
America: Land of the Plumed Serpent
THE WATCHMEN SERIES

This blog was researched, written, and continues to be maintained by 1 person. If you enjoyed it and would like to encourage more of them, donations can be made by clicking the button below.

Thursday, February 28, 2019

Chris Cornell Death

[PT III]

"He would come home from work, he would sit down in his chair, pour like a bourbon/rocks...he would not say a word. And this would go on for hours. And if he did speak, that meant your ass...and that was kinda it...I think it's just handed down. Genreation to generation the...Irish Catholic drunk kinda way of expressing all your emotions...It's been years...I never had a relationship with him because he wasn't that kind of dad...I never communicated with him at all [laughs]...yeah I dunno...when you grow up without having a relationship with your father, you don't really know any different." - Chris Cornell on Howard Stern show, 2011

Mother, who's your man
Is he doing what he can
To make a proper home, home
By overturning other stones, stones
Father, mighty man
Loves his little boys, boys
Shows them how to kill
To save his precious stones, stones
- Soundgarden "Far Beyond the Wheel"


His parents are Edward F. Boyle, a pharmacist of Irish-Catholic background, and Karen Cornell, an accountant and psychic of Jewish background - Wiki

Got my arms around baby brother
Put your hands away
Your gonna kill your mother, gonna kill your mother
Kill your mother
And I love her, yeah
I love her
- Soundgarden "Hands all Over"

"I try to beat it....if I go to a song, and there's a lot of them that came outta really bad places...but because I came out of that bad place there's sort of a triumphant approach to being able to sing it now...there's some sort of positive attitude that comes out of the fact that "look at how lucky I am?" That I get to express those things in music and then go out and play it for other people. What ends up happening is...people will come up to me...and they will point out those specific songs..and say, "this helped me through a really difficult time." - strobe.com, 2009

If I took you for a ride, would you take it wrong?
Or would you make it right, make it right?
Looking for a pedestal that I can put you on
And be on my way, on my way
-Soundgarden "Searching with my Good Eye Closed"

Since publishing my last blog on this topic, I have obtained the official 57 page Police Investigative Report, as released to the public around July of 2017. Although it does include crime scene photos, pictures of Cornell's body have been completely redacted, per request by his widow. Most of this report was released in pieces to the public via Detroit News, TMZ, and various other news outlets and is not very hard to find online last I checked. While my previous 2 blogs concerning this topic spent a lot of time focussing on the media and its consistently biased reporting from the start, this blog will be more devoted to analyzing the source information in the report. A few basic things which are not clear in this report, and that we will explore in detail:

What time Cornell died

Who the last person was to see him alive

How many Ativan pills he took, when, and who was in possession of the pill bottle

Exactly how he supposedly hung himself

Needless to say, some of the information and pictures in this blog are very disturbing. No details are presented here to be gratuitous or purely for shock value, but it is necessary to get graphic at certain points in order to establish any sort of clarity and truth.

NOTE: Some of the photos in this blog are high resolution, and must be blown up in order to see the finer details. If you are on a Smart Phone, you will not see some of these details I point out unless you actually tap on the photo, then blow it up. If you simply try to enlarge the screen without tapping on the photo, it will look low resolution and details will be blurry or lost. Some of the points I make here cannot be fully appreciated without blowing certain photos up, so this is a critical point.

HOW EXACTLY DID CORNELL HANG HIMSELF?

The exercise band Cornell supposedly used to hang himself with was composed of 4 parts: A black door anchor [upon which is a Bionic Body logo, which I underlined in yellow above], a black carabiner clip, the red band itself [also referred to as a "tube"], and a black handle upon the opposite end. The picture above shows the door anchor, carabiner, and exercise band [The fat end of the door anchor is slightly cropped outside of view]. These parts were designed to work together in a very specific way, and below is an actual image from the Bionic Body website showing the same Door Anchor and carabiner Cornell owned.

Before getting into what the report says, it would be helpful to briefly explain how these tools are supposed to be used.

Although this man is not using the Bionic Body brand, the basic mechanics behind using a door anchor with a resistance band/tube is the same. Note the fat end on one side, a loop on the other. Notice the different colored bands coiled on top of the table to the left. These are exercise bands with different weight resistances.

A door anchor can be positioned on the side of the door, the bottom, or along the top, depending on what sort of workout/muscle group the user intends to exercise. [Note how close the man's head is to the top of the door above]

The yellow arrow above indicates where the resistance band is looped through the door anchor. The brand Cornell used has a carabiner clipped through this loop on the user's side of the door. The reason for linking a carabiner clip between the end of the exercise band and the door anchor loop is to more easily and quickly switch them out. It also makes it a lot easier to stack them together, in order to increase resistance that much more. According to the Case Registration Summary for the Wayne County Medical Examiner, Cornell also had a blue exercise band in his room the night he died. The color of these exercise bands denote WEIGHT RESISTANCE, which is why users typically own more than one color. If you want a more intense/less intense workout, you simply switch to a band/tube with a different weight resistance rating, or stack them together in whatever combination desired.

Now that we know how these tools are supposed to be used, let's take a look at how the report says Cornell used them to hang from his bathroom door.

There is really only 1 interview of Martin Kirsten anywhere regarding this event, and above is a section of it. Let's call this NARRATIVE 1. It was conducted by the homicide detective at the scene of the crime at 3:10am, and is in the detective's handwriting. There are indications that certain statements by Kirsten were abbreviated/summarized by the detective. So this isn't even really a raw interview, it's more of an interpretation. The fact the public never got a single raw interview with this man should raise suspicion right off the bat. Martin Kirsten is the only person we know of, with first hand knowledge of how Cornell hung himself, as he supposedly found the body. Here is what the interview says regarding that.

"I went inside and the bathroom door was partially opened and I could see his feet. I saw the band around his neck he was on the floor. I forced the band from wherever it was hanging and attempted loosen the band from around his neck and began chest compressions with I believe my left hand."

First off, Kirsten mentions a "band" and nothing else. No carabiner clip is mentioned at all, nothing jammed into the door, no door anchor. In fact, he doesn't say anything indicating Cornell hung from the door at all! Mr Kirsten is a bodyguard, and I am sure he works out. People who need to be fit for their career would probably recognize an exercise band, and it's parts, a lot quicker than people who do not need to be fit for their job. Further, as Cornell's bodyguard, he'd also be aware of his various routines - and his use of exercise bands on the road was obviously part of his regular workout routine. One would think Martin would give a little more details here, or that the homicide detective would probe a bit more for clarification. He says he forced the band from "wherever it was hanging." How can he not know what it was hanging from if he physically forced it down? What exactly was securing the band in place and how did the door manage to open before Mr Kirsten arrived - if the door was used in the hanging? There is also no mention of blood. Again, this is the only direct statement we get from Kirsten regarding these details, and they are extremely vague. There are no apparent attempts to clarify these details anywhere in this report.

The phrase "life saving protocols" is found in several places in this report, including NARRATIVE 1. This is how I determined that the words in NARRATIVE 1 are not necessarily direct quotes from Kirsten. Kirsten states that he started chest compressions initially, but is later quoted in the same report as using the term "life saving protocols." People don't talk this way in conversation, this is a go to phrase used by more than one member of this investigation in the report. That may seem like a small, petty detail, but again, we don't seem to have a raw interview with Kirsten regarding this event ANYWHERE! The closest thing we've got is NARRATIVE 1, which fluctuates from appearing to quote Kirsten by using "I" several times, to summarizing quotes with phrases such as "life saving protocols."

The next narrative we get was conducted by Alonzo Tolefree, and/or Sylvester Hewston around 4:20am. Note that "Tolefree Casino 1" is listed in an earlier image I posted above, listing this as "crime: suicide" at 2:35 am. That was about 2 hours before they interviewed Martin Kirsten and about 2 hours before the Homicide Investigator had completed his interview with Martin Kirsten! Let's call this NARRATIVE 2.

"At this time, pro [Kirsten] kicked in bedroom door and found victim laying on bathroom floor with blood running from his mouth and a red exercise band around victim’s neck. At 12:56AM, MGM medic XXXX stated she came to room 11:36 and she stated door was open and she found victim laying on bathroom floor with red exercise band around his neck. XXXX untied red exercise band from victim’s neck and began CPR on victim which was not breathing at this time."

There is still NO MENTION of the door having been used at all in the alleged hanging. Mr Kirsten should have been regarded as suspect #1 in a possible murder at this point, as his innocence would have been far from proven as of yet. They didn't grill him on details regarding what Cornell's noose was hanging from?

Kirsten does not make it clear what time he discovered Cornell's body, but the last time he gives in NARRATIVE 1 is 11:34pm. The above narrative states that the MGM medic showed up at 12:56. That's a 22 minute gap from the last time reference we got. This medic was a woman [Dawn Jones, according to a news article I encountered while researching earlier blogs], and the band was still around Cornell's neck when she arrived and the body was still on the bathroom floor. She then "untied" the band from around victim's neck.

As I pointed out in a previous blog, the above "noose" is not tied, it is clearly attached with a clip device. So why did the medic state she untied it? Kirsten also states he already loosened it before the medic arrived. Kirsten said nothing about it being tied before that. It seems strange that Kirsten would loosen the band, but leave it around Cornell's neck during the entire time he performed chest compressions, up until the MGM medic arrived - who then "untied" a band which was never tied to begin with! The medic mentions blood, whereas Kirsten said nothing about blood. I would imagine there was a lot of blood as Kirsten attempted to revive Cornell, given what some of the photos show. How many minutes was he alone with the body performing chest compressions? We don't know because there is so little to go on with regard to this 22 minute gap so far.

It isn't clear who conducted NARRATIVE 3, but here it is.

"He stated that he entered the room and observed the bathroom door slightly opened. He was able to see the decedent’s feet in the bathroom and pushed the door open. Upon entry, he found the decedent on the floor with a red resistance band around his neck and the opposite end of the band across the top of the entry door. He released the band from on top of the door and loosened the end around the decedent’s neck and began chest compressions. He continued chest compressions until the arrival of MGM medical personnel, who were subsequently replaced by Detroit EMS. They attempted life saving protocols for sometime until pronouncing death."

In this 3rd narrative, we finally get the detail regarding what the band was supposedly hanging from. Regarding technical aspects of how the band was fastened to the top of the door, we get nothing. Only that the opposite end of the band was "across the top of the entry door." We've seen how the exercise band is designed to be locked into the closed door. Given that, this explanation in narrative 3 simply makes no sense. The band could not possibly have been attached to the top of the door at all, since it was open! There's no mention of a carabiner clip and no mention of the door anchor. Mr Kirsten "pushed the door open," which further begs the question, "what was holding that band into place on top of the door as Kirsten pushed the door open, which would then require him to "force it" down?" Without further explanation, this detail should be assumed incomplete at best, a lie at worst! Again, no mention of blood. We get no additional details regarding time, but it is stated that Detroit EMS showed up after the MGM medic.

[Chris Cornell was 6'3. He was too tall to have hung himself in the manner depicted above, as is the woman holding the noose!]

I assume this is Angela Anderson Cobb, who is listed on the Medical Examiner's Case Registration Summary as arriving on the scene at 3:53am. This is not the MGM Medic who showed up first, this is the City of Detroit Medic who showed up after. The color photo showing the noose is the one most people saw. I notated in a previous blog how this picture limits perspective by cropping out the bottom of the noose. The one below it was published by TMZ, and looks a lot crappier as you can tell. The reason for this, is that when you order the official report, not all of the photos are included digitally on CD. A small stack of them are only included as cheap black and white paper copies. So if someone wants to upload those particular photos, it would have to be scanned, then posted online - making them 2nd generation quality at best, greatly compromising their clarity, discouraging people from posting them, and probably causing some people to think they are fake. The reason certain photos were only released publicly in this manner should be regarded as suspicious for several valid reasons.

First off, nobody in the first 3 official narratives mentioned anything about a carabiner clip. In fact, it isn't until narrative 3 that the door is specifically mentioned as what Cornell hung from. As we saw, it stated that the red band was laid across the top of the door. No mention at all of a carabiner or door anchor. So why is it that in the above pictures, they are laying the CARABINER across the top of the door, and not the exercise band? Nobody said he used it this way, and it's not even the proper way to fasten the tube on top of the door! One reason they could have done this would be to rule out one possible way Cornell may have used it. But the Medical Examiner later confirms that this is the way he did it in their own official documents! Only reason I can see for pushing this "carabiner theory" was simply to confuse people.

The color images indicate that investigators were in possession of perfectly clear digital copies of these pictures. But strangely, the only picture clearly revealing that Cornell, at 6'3, was too tall to have hung himself at this height - was only released in the form of a badly printed hard copy. Look at how low the bottom of the noose is. Do we really need to draw some elaborate diagram showing that this is indeed too low for a 6'3 man to have hung suspended from? Sure, he could have choked himself at this height, but that is not what we were told. To "hang" yourself doesn't mean you "choked" yourself while leaning forward with a noose wrapped around your neck and jammed into the top of a door.

"Hang: to fasten to some elevated point without support from below" - Webster's Online Dictionary
"Hang: suspend or be suspended from above with the lower part dangling free." - Google

To HANG means you are SUSPENDED completely in the air, without your feet touching the ground. For Cornell to have hung himself from this noose in the way depicted in the pictures above is IMPOSSIBLE. In fact, the woman in the picture couldn't have either! You have to wonder what was going on in her mind while these photos were being taken. Imagine you are staring down at this noose for a photo, and the blood of a 6'3 man is on the floor near you, and people are saying he hung himself from this door, using the noose in your hand, which isn't even tall enough to hang YOU.

"I saw the band around his neck he was ON THE FLOOR." - Narrative 1

"At this time, pro kicked in bedroom door and found victim laying ON BATHROOM FLOOR with blood running from his mouth and a red exercise band around victim’s neck." - Narrative 2

"Upon entry, he found the decedent ON THE FLOOR with a red resistance band around his neck and the opposite end of the band across the top of the entry door." - Narrative 3

"Per information given to me by the investigating officer, the deceased was discovered by his bodyguard SUSPENDED by the neck from the above described item." - Case Registration Summary for the Wayne County Medical Examiner

Notice that the body was found on the floor, until the Medical Examiner's Case Registration summary is typed up. Everything before that was information allegedly gathered directly from Mr Kirsten by officers on the scene. The story was changed once the Medical Examiner's documents came into play, therefore, the last quote above appears to be false. Why would an "investigating officer" give the medical examiner details which are not consistent with 3 different official reports, one of which is supposed to be directly quoting Mr Kirsten, clearly stating the body was found on the floor? She didn't even say "partially suspended," she said "suspended!" We already looked at the meaning of HANG from 2 different sources!

"Inside of the bathroom there is a Burgundy rubber resistance exercise tube with a metal clip on one end and a black handle on the other. Part of the rubber tubing is looped through this handle."

This is the first time anyone mentions a "metal clip" on one end of the tube, and it's not even a complete description.

[If you are on a Smart Phone, you need to tap on the above image in order to properly blow it up and see the details]

What happened to the door anchor? Isn't that on one end of the tube? For some reason, the phrase "DOOR ANCHOR" appears nowhere in this report! The metal clip is BETWEEN the end of the tube and the door anchor, on the opposite end of the handle. Why is the Medical Examiner pretending the door anchor doesn't exist? Probably because it makes absolutely no sense to jam a carabiner into a door, instead of a perfectly functional door anchor, only to have the noose hang halfway down the door - where a 6'3 man could not possibly hang suspended from! I suppose they figured omitting any mention of the door anchor in the report would draw less attention to the absurdity of the carabiner theory? And why is the Medical Examiner presenting this carabiner theory seemingly out of nowhere when it clearly isn't plausible, nor was it mentioned in any of the first 3 narratives provided by Mr Kirsten? In fact, the photos in the official report show NO EVIDENCE that the carabiner was jammed into the top of the door. What the evidence DOES support, is that the TUBE was laid across the top of the door - consistent with Mr Kirsten's initial interviews [we will look closely at this later in the blog].

Notice the word HEAVY printed on the red tube in the above photo. You may have never noticed this before, because all of the photos released by Detroit News and TMZ either show the side of the tube this word is NOT printed on, or it is obscured in some manner. There is a very plausible reason this may have been done, because it suggests the tube is a MISMATCH with the other Bionic Body gear Cornell owned.

In the above Bionic Body ad, we can see these tubes come with a label attached to the end denoting weight resistance. The red one is rated at 70LBs, clearly. On the Bionic Body website, Kim Lyons is featured in a demonstration video where she clearly states the tubes are rated 20-100LBs. They are also listed for sale, from 20-100LBs. Chris Cornell was 180Lbs. He could not have even hung from a Bionic Body tube without it snapping! So now we can see one reason why it would have been switched. The fact major news media didn't notice this or feel that it was worth mentioning anywhere suggests they are turning a blind eye to certain details purposefully. And yet, TMZ has time and resources to fabricate articles suggesting Cornell was a needle junkie, only to quietly retract the suggestion later, after the public has already taken the bait. Even as recent as the day I type this, in 2019, the media has not let up on this campaign to CONVINCE the public Cornell had a lethal drug problem. And his widow is at the head of this campaign.

"Chris Cornell’s Widow Implores Congress to Act on Opioid Crisis: His 'Death Was Not Inevitable'" -People.com 02.26.19

It's almost as if Vicky is BEGGING the public to buy this story. Sorry, NO OPIOIDS were found in Cornell's body according to the Toxicology report. The Narcan was injected AFTER he was dead in an attempt to revive him, and TMZ tried to make it look like Cornell shot up beforehand, hoping to deceive fans who don't look that closely at details. But sure, go ahead, insult the fan's intelligence and throw some more dirt on top of Cornell's grave! Vicky is actively involved in a coverup regarding her husband's death. Whether she was/is a willing participant or not in this conspiracy is an interesting question.

"A similar resistance band, this one blue is lying on the bed" - Medical Examiner Case Registration Summary

Notice how in this far away shot, it does look like 1 single resistance band. I see green myself, but at least it half-way appears to match the Medical Examiner's quote above. This photo was published by Detroit News.

This is one of the TMZ photos, slightly cropped [#19 of the original article], clearly showing 2 bands. One green, one blue. Why did the Medical Examiner note 1 blue band upon the bed, but not the green one? We can see they are attached to 1 handle, stacked together. But that does not make them 1, it is still 2 tubes of different colors. Either the medical Examiner is not recording accurate details here or the photos are staged incorrectly. You pick which one, but either is enough to bring into question the accuracy of this investigation. Details like this put people in jail (or keep them out). You don't say there is 1 of something where there is clearly 2. Especially when it is in reference to a potential murder weapon at the scene of a crime.

The tubes pictured above, like the red one shown earlier, also do not have Bionic Body labels on them, and appear to be the same mismatched brand as the red one featured in the official photos. I searched for these exact tubes online and could not find a match. But again, these types of tubes are not typically rated to resist more than 100LBs. So while we can rule out the idea that Cornell hung from the height demonstrated in the earlier photos, we can't necessarily rule out whether the tube was strong enough to support his weight because we don't know what brand these are. "Heavy," could mean it has 180LB resistance. It would be interesting to see what word is printed on the end of the blue and green tubes. But conveniently, they are turned on the side concealing this label in the photos above.

"This notch appears to be indicative of where the resistance band was positioned when used as tool for hanging." - Narrative 3

We are viewing the bathroom door from the outside [Cornell supposedly hung himself on the INSIDE of the bathroom]. What exactly caused this notch? Well they are telling you above that the RESISTANCE BAND was positioned here. Given that, why would we assume anything but the resistance band created this notch? Before getting more into that, let's confirm that there is NO EVIDENCE supporting that a carabiner was ever used in the manner suggested in the Medical Examiner's documents.


The metal arm you see is called a Top Jamb style concealed door closer mechanism. This is a discreet version of any door closer you might see in a classroom or office building. They are designed to prevent doors from slamming, and automatically close them softly. The arm is installed into the upper door frame, where it is bolted into a stationary position. A track is built into the top of the door, and it glides back and fourth as the door opens and closes. As you can see, the arm must come to rest exactly, or even past where the notch is, upon the closing of the door. The reason the door is carved the way it is, is to allow the metal arm to glide back and fourth. If the metal arm did not need to rest where the notch is, the door would not be carved out that far along the top! If the carabiner was placed just over the notch, not only would it be meeting resistance from the top of the door frame as the door tries to close, but the metal arm closer would be blocked before it could reach it's closing position. In other words, the door could not even close with that carabiner placed there! I mean, unless Cornell shut the door so hard that it created one hell of a dent in the top of the door, the upper door frame, and basically destroyed the metal arm closer mechanism! Incidentally, there is not one single picture in this report of the inside/upper part of the door frame - where there would have to be some sort of impression from the carabiner, had it been jammed this way [which it obviously wasn't].

Now let's look at a TMZ published photo. Notice how the color of the TMZ imprint almost exactly matches the paint where it was scratched. Obviously, all of the TMZ photos have this transparent stamp upon them, but this one interferes with details in a very perceptible way. The left "leg" of the letter M is right on top of the notch, and confuses the finer details by slightly warping the appearance of colors. Was this done purposefully? It seems rather stupid to stamp the logo directly on top of the most important detail in the photo. Why publish these at all only to obscure the most important details in the picture?

Remember, Cornell supposedly hung himself on the opposite side of this door. A stationary carabiner sitting jammed horizontally on top of the door physically could not have created a notch running that far down the side, and the loop connected to it has no paint visibly on it. Whatever created this notch shredded the paint, and was pulled downward at an angle TOWARDS the crevice. There is no physical way Cornell could have pulled anything at this angle on the outside of the door, while he hung on the inside. His weight would actually be pulling in the OPPOSITE direction! Someone had to be on the outside of the door, pulling downwards, and towards the crevice. This is why the shredded paint is at an angle. The crevice was being used to prevent the tube from slipping from side to side, as 180LBS hung upon the opposite end of it. Also notice there is only 1 scratch on top of the door where the blue gloved finger is. The carabiner would have made 2 scratches side by side, had 180LBs been pressed down upon it in the manner suggested. There is no visible evidence here that the carabiner was ever jammed into this position. Did anyone at The Detroit News bother to look closely at these photos before telling the world Cornell hung himself? Either my name is Sherlock Holmes or mainstream news media has deliberately fed the public false information regarding Cornell's death!

[If you are on a Smart Phone, you need to tap on the above image in order to properly blow it up and see the details]

Have you ever wondered what that tannish powdery stuff is on the red tube? I did for a long time. It is paint from the top of the door. The positioning of the clip here was arranged to give the impression that the tannish markings were caused by it pulling against the tube. But if you look closely where the lower left arrow is pointing, that is shredded paint, just like we saw in the notch on the OUTSIDE of the door. This part of the tube was not being pulled by the clip, it was being pulled violently into the crevice on the outside of the door, creating the notch. So just like the first few narratives suggested, the red tube was in fact, laid across the top of the door. No carabiner was jammed in this scenario, that is pure bullshit. The arrow pointing to the torn rubber is probably where the clip was actually being pulled on the INSIDE of the door, creating an EXTREMELY tight noose around Cornell's neck. If you look carefully, you can even see how the tube is warped slightly in this exact spot, further contributing to the idea that the clip was being pulled very hard into it at this position. This scenario would place Cornell's neck directly level with the top of the door, not halfway down the door as depicted in the ridiculous photos we saw earlier. As he struggled, the back of his head would likely be banging against the wall. If he had injuries on the back of his head, this is probably how he got them and why these injuries would need to be covered up. Because this would be evidence of a struggle. By redacting these injuries from the final report and focusing on the absurd "carabiner theory," the public is then deceived and confused to the point of giving up.

Notice above where the Z imprint is. It is right on top of the tube where the tannish paint powder is running along it. Isn't it interesting that the placement of this Z manages to help conceal the manner in which the tube was actually used? The clip is again, being suggestively placed to give the impression that the tannish markings were the result of the clip being pulled into the tube. The report mentions nothing about these details, but pictures don't lie. That clip did not transfer tannish paint/dust onto the tube, the top of the door did. Here is the image without the TMZ imprint, slightly blown up:

Now that we can see the tannish markings along the tube, this begs the question, "how did shredded paint and other tannish markings get there?" Well, a metal clip certainly didn't do it! That then leads to the only possible conclusion, that this part of the tube was being pulled against the top of the door, transfering paint onto it, as it shredded. No other tools have paint on them. Not the carabiner, not the handle, not the door anchor.

The red line above is representative of the resistance tube, laid across the notch - just how Mr Kirsten stated in his original testimony to Detective Weaver in Narrative 1. I purposefully made the line thin so you can see how well this tube would fit into the notch, as well as the single scratch indicated where the person's gloved finger is placed. The notch runs fairly far down the door in a vertical motion. As you can see, the red tube would have to have been pulled downwards and towards the crevice in the door here, in order to have created that notch. Whoever did this was probably very strong, or had help. How Cornell was forced into this position on the inside of the bathroom, and how he remained there is another story. But it seems clear this would have required at least 2 people. 1 to subdue him inside the bathroom, and one to pull the tube downwards from the outside. If he really wanted to kill himself, he didn't need to get this complicated about it.

As far as the metal arm and the door closer mechanism - in some of the above pictures you will notice there is quite a bit of paint dust on the top of the arm. It is wiped off however, just on the tip. This is where the red tube slipped over the top of it just above the notch upon the closing of the door. Being that the tube can be stretched and smooshed, it is much more plausible than the carabiner as far as the door being able to close with it jammed above. If someone wanted to murder Cornell this way, I doubt they would have left anything to chance. They would have known which resistance tube was required for the job, again highlighting the fact that the tube is a mismatch with the other Bionic Body Gear found at the crime scene.

I said earlier that it isn't clear who the last person was to see Cornell alive in this report. Are you starting to see why this is such a critical detail? The strength of the resistance tube is still a little in question, but we have resolved the issue of height, the issue of the door being able to close, and the issue of the head injury - which was not my intent at all, it just became obvious when positioning the red tube over the door. Although there is a document floating around online, and a supposed 911 call - both confirming the injury on the back of Cornell's head, neither are mentioned in this report. However, the Medical Examiner's questionable Case Registration Summary does say this:

"...male is lying supine [face up] on the floor of the suite's bedroom area having been moved there to facilitate resuscitative efforts...stains of suspected blood are present on his face and on the floor next to and beneath his head."

I don't want to comment too much on the blood, because I have no idea what a hanging does to a person's throat, which might cause so much of it. To have it pouring from his mouth seems at least plausible. To have excessive blood on the back of his head on the other hand, seems a lot less plausible. Trauma on the back of his head from hitting the wall would indicate resistance to being hung, which contradicts the suicide theory. But with murder, it fits. Pictures showing the wall just above the door inside the bathroom might help clear this up, but there are none in the report. Every photo where the camera is pointed towards that part of the wall, the door is open just enough to block it. [Another fishy detail worth notating] If he was dragged from the bathroom, to the bedroom, and there was still enough blood to stain the ground under his head in the bedroom - I would say this lends itself to the idea that he had a wound on the back of his head. But since all photos of Cornell's body have been redacted from the report and his body was hastily cremated, there is no way we can confirm this. But between his torn shirt and all the blood, the possibility of a struggle seems quite plausible. Cornell was a strong man, he would have fought for his life.

One last note regarding the alleged "head injury." While I do think Cornell may have suffered injuries to the back of his head at the scene of the crime, there are no documents in the actual report backing this up. That's not to say that they weren't redacted, or that documents floating around the internet are not legitimate, they may be. But this idea he had an injury to the back of his head earlier in the evening, DURING the last Soundgarden show, is a bit harder to swallow for me. I have seen the footage and the picture stills and I am not convinced myself. It also seems like a potentially confusing bit of disinformation, designed to send people off into an endless labyrinth of questions ultimately leading nowhere.

WHO WAS THE LAST PERSON TO SEE CORNELL ALIVE?


[Narrative 1] "Chris called me and said that Apple TV was not working. I arranged for hotel IT to bring the remote that provides access to the hotel’s network. That was around 11:34 PM. I was in my room and was watching television when I received a phone call from his wife Vicki. She sounded angry because he wasn’t responding to his phone. She told me to go to the room and check on Chris."

Who was this Hotel IT person and where is the interview with him/her? Mr Kirsten doesn't say he went to Cornell's room to fix anything, he says he "arranged for hotel IT to bring the remote..." Well where did they bring it? To Mr Kirsten's room? To Cornell? Isn't it important to specify where this IT person took that remote? Because if they took it to Cornell's room, that would mean the faceless IT representative was the last one to see him alive!

Mr Kirsten then states he was in his room and got a call from "Vicki" [many names are misspelled in this 3 page interview]. Not only does Mr Kirsten say nothing about going to Cornell's room to fix his computer, he says nothing about returning to his room after things are sorted out! So based upon his direct testimony, why would anyone assume he went to Cornell's room at all to "fix his computer?"

[Narrative 2] "Bodyguard for rockband Soundgarden who states he was in above hotel room with victim (Christopher Cornell lead singer for group Soundgarden) at 11:30PM on 5/17/2017 trying to fix victim’s computer which was not working at the time. PRO fixed computer and then gave him 2 sleeping pills (adalan) in which victim takes for anxiety. Pro left room and went to his room 2 doors down."

The story has now changed significantly. "Apple TV" turned into a "computer" and the call to IT is left out completely, even though Mr Kirsten made it clear in his own earlier testimony that they were called to "bring the remote" somewhere. He then gives Cornell 2 sleeping pills, and leaves [this business with the pills gets extremely confusing, so I will cover that seperately].

[Narrative 3] "Mr Kirsten stated that Mr Cornell called him to report that his television was not working and to facilitate the repair. Mr Kirsten arranged for hotel IT staff to come to Mr Cornell’s room to facilitate access to their network for his usage on his personal Apple TV. Mr Kirsten stated that during this time he was talking by telephone to his wife. Upon completion of the resolution of the IT problem, Mr Kirsten returned to his hotel room."

Here is yet another different version of events. The above narrative states that IT went directly to Cornell's room. Nothing is mentioned about Mr Kirsten going to Cornell's room, only that he "returned to his hotel room." Returned from where? From the Hotel lobby? How do we know he even went to Cornell's room based on the above and how do we know who the last person was to leave Cornell's room, or that they even left at all? "...completion of the IT problem" does not specify who from IT showed up or what time they left or what Mr Kirsten's part was in all of that. The narrative above said Cornell called Mr Kirsten to "facilitate the repair," that's not the same as "come to my room to fix my computer." You don't have to be present physically to facilitate something. We assume that now because we know what the media has been pushing. But we're supposed to be reading from the horse's mouth here! It's not clearly saying he went to Cornell's room at all! Did news journalists get together and just decide on a version they would all push onto the public, which was a combination of the 3 narratives?

The above narrative also states that Mr Kirsten was talking to Cornell's wife either during, or at some point before the IT problem was resolved. How was Mr Kirsten "fixing Cornell's computer" if he was also talking to Cornell's wife at the same time? And what were they talking about, since this was presumably before she spoke with her husband and heard him slurring his words? Ever get the feeling we're just being told a bunch of bullshit here to send us around in circles? How hard is it to determine clearly who did what and when, since there really is only 2 people, plus the IT personnel, who were present in some way shortly before Cornell died? Cell phones give exact times. Cornell's phone was not recovered, according to the report. Pretty important piece of missing evidence I'd say. And pretty convenient for anyone trying to cover things up here.

Given the fact there are 3 different versions of this story within 3 different official reports - and that Mr Kirsten was the primary source of the information, I don't see how any news journalist could have written a factual article on this particular topic and I don't see how anyone could have accepted that the truth was ever obtained from Mr Kirsten. If the news media was really concerned with reporting the truth, they would have notated the alarming signs of foul play here and blatant inconsistencies with the official narratives!

"To rule out the possibility that someone else had killed Cornell, 52, detectives poured through the hotel's surveillance video, which was trained on the corridor outside his 11th floor room. They found nobody had entered or exited the suite after his bodyguard left around 11:35pm Wednesday, according to the source." - The Detroit News, May 22nd, 2017

The above quote from Detroit News is what Wikipedia is basing it's determination that Cornell was not murdered upon. First of all, this footage is mentioned nowhere in the official report, and yet it seems to have been determined a suicide from the start. None of this surveillance footage has surfaced anywhere, even though surveillance footage shows up daily in the news showing drunk drivers slamming into buildings, people throwing tantrums, people robbing stores, etc... Not even a nice still image of Mr Kirsten heroically kicking in Cornell's door has appeared. The specific wording they use referencing the source in that article is, "a Detroit Police source with knowledge of the investigation." I'm sure police use many "sources" to get their information, but that doesn't make every source an official member of the police department, or an official member of the investigation! The credentials this unknown source has, is that they have "knowledge of the investigation." Notice how specific that sounds initially, but descends rapidly into vagueness upon closer examination. They coulda said "Police spoke with someone who knows a lot about what happened and he said the surveillance footage rules out foul play." That's basically the same statement, just written out a bit more plainly and less deceptively. If this is what people out there are calling "proof" that Cornell was not murdered, I find that pretty sad.

The first line in the quote doesn't actually even clearly say Cornell wasn't murdered by someone. It says they ruled out the possibility that "someone else had killed Cornell." Someone else? Why is it so hard to just say, "detectives ruled out MURDER by watching the Hotel surveillance footage?" Ruling out murder means nobody murdered him. Ruling out that SOMEONE ELSE had killed him" makes it sound like someone is being ruled out, not that murder is being ruled out! Why are they messing around with words like this?

[Narrative 2] "Pro [Mr Kirsten] received a call from victim’s wife at 12:15 AM on 5/18/2017…who stated she talked to her husband (victim) at 11:35pm on 5/17/2017 who stated to wife that he was groggy and just kept saying I am just tired and hung up the phone."

If Cornell got a call from his wife at 11:35, within 1 minute of Mr Kirsten leaving his room, that's a pretty well timed call I'd say, because it provides the only evidence Cornell was still alive at that point. The fact his phone was not recovered means that Vicky's phone showing a call to Cornell at 11:35 would be the only potential proof he was still alive when Mr Kirsten left his room. That doesn't even necessarily mean Cornell received the call, without hearing the call itself. The murderer could have answered the phone, showing a call was received on Cornell's end. But again, Cornell's phone disappeared so, who cares right? Vicky was not present physically, so how did investigators determine so quickly that Cornell was not already dead when Mr Kirsten left at 11:35, even if they had managed to already SCOUR THROUGH the MGM surveillance footage? Her phone was not present for them to verify this call was made at 11:35. We also don't know what time these IT personnel showed up exactly or when they left, and we have conflicting reports as to whether Mr Kirsten went to Cornell's room at all to deal with the IT issue.

As far as Cornell's room being locked from the inside - Mr Kirsten had a key. He could have spent that 22 minute time gap mentioned earlier doctoring up the area to make it look like he broke into a suicide scene. Where is the footage of Mr Kirsten kicking doors down, where are the voice recordings of him frantically calling the front desk, and where are the phone calls of Vicky talking to Mr Kirsten while he is kicking these doors down? Until the surveillance footage and phone calls surface, I don't see any logical reason to buy any of this. There's just too many problems here, nothing comes together.

By the way, MGM also owns Mandalay Bay - where the worst concert shooting in American history occurred just a few months after this event. MGM then proceeded to sue 1,900 victims, according to NBC News, as a pre-emptive measure to circumvent the lawsuits they had been presented with or anticipated. After public outcry, MGM then offered to donate the cost of serving defendants their papers to charity, in an attempt to regain public affection. When we consider the security breaches likely necessary to have allowed that shooting to occur, Cornell's murder would have required a much smaller effort of corruption on the inside. MGM appeared very sketchy in 2017, to say the least.

"There are prescription bottles for Omeprazole and Prednisone prescribed to the deceased. I did not observe any other medications, illicit substances, alcohol or tobacco products at the scene." - Page 18, Medical Examiner's Case Registration Summary

The Medical Examiner's quote above matches the color picture with the 2 pill bottles in it. The black and white one under it however, presents a real problem. First off, remember the other black and white picture earlier, which revealed the noose was hanging too low to have hung Cornell from the door? Well the black and white picture above showing a bottle of Lorazepam [Ativan] was also not on the disc with the other photos, but was only included as a crappy printed hard copy on paper. So again, a very critical detail provided separately from the other images in the report, forcing the press to scan it and publish a 2nd generation copy - or decide not to include it due to the poor quality. The Medical Examiner says there were no other bottles or drugs observed in the room. So where was this picture of the Lorazepam taken? Every other photo in the report was taken in Cornell's room or just in front of the door.

"I spoke with the investigator Weaver as well as the bodyguard of the deceased, Mr Martin Kirsten. Mr Kirsten stated that he spoke to the deceased in person at approximately 23:30 [11:30pm] on May 17, 2017. At that time the deceased reportedly took two Lorazepam 2mg tablet which were from a prescription bottle prescribed to the deceased."

The Toxicology report indicates that Cornell had taken 4 of these Lorazepam pills. Cornell's wife also stated to the press that he told her over the phone that he may have taken "an extra Ativan or 2." The word "extra" indicates he had already taken the 2 his bodyguard gave him before taking more. This is why the location of the bottle throughout the evening is so important to determine. If Mr Kirsten had it, then left at 11:30 - how did Cornell take 2 more after that? If Kirsten gave him 4, why did he maintain he only gave him 2? If the bottle wasn't found in the room, how did it get back in there for a photo to be taken of it? If the bottle was taken outside of the room at 11:30, there is no way Cornell could have taken 2 more because Mr Kirsten [and the surveillance footage supposedly backs this up] never went back in until he found Cornell dead. These official documents themselves don't even agree with one another on critical details. Again and again, we must wonder how mainstream media was able to come to any clear conclusions on these matters, and who thought these unverifiable "facts" were solid enough to push onto the public? The fact that contradictions in this report are ALWAYS assumed to err on the side favoring suicide is a very clear indication of a coverup on multiple levels. Or, at the very least, a complete lack of objective observation.

WHAT TIME DID CORNELL DIE?

The last time reference Mr Kirsten gave in his own testimony before rushing over to break Cornell's door down, was 11:34PM. He doesn't make it clear if this was DURING or AFTER the conclusion of the Apple TV business. But he indicates that it was around that time.

"Pro [Mr Kirsten] received a call from victim’s wife at 12:15 AM on 5/18/2017…who stated she talked to her husband (victim) at 11:35 on 5/17/2017 who stated to wife that he was groggy and just kept saying I am just tired and hung up the phone." Narrative 2

Narrative 2 has a statement attributed to Vicky Cornell stating she last spoke with her husband on the phone at 11:35 - one minute after Mr Kirsten says he left in one account [the accounts vary as we know]. The Detroit News also makes specific reference to the time of 11:35 as the point where their "source" claims investigators did not view anyone coming or going from Cornell's room after. I find it strange that the last time reference we get before Cornell is found dead, is exactly 1 minute before 11:36. 1136 was Cornell's room number, and above is an alleged picture of the front door to his room that night. I wanted to try and stay away from the whole "creepy numbers" angle here, but it's just kind of staring us in the face so I figured it was worth pointing out. Was 11:36 the time Cornell was supposed to be murdered?

I thought it was a little odd that the numbers on the right are bigger than the numbers on the left. It doesn't look very good, does it? In the report there is a very clear close up of this, and in it you can see that the numbers on the right, with a white background, are on a separate sign placed next to the numbers on the left. Pretty tacky for an MGM grand Hotel, I'd say. However, the full number "1136" in braille is etched completely into the lower right side upon close examination. This was how I ruled out the idea that the room number was changed for the photos. However, I still find it a bit odd that the colors and difference in size of the numbers on the left, vs the numbers on the right subconsciously suggest viewing them as separate from one another. Why is that significant? Well, if you add up the numbers on the right, 3 + 6, you get 9. So now the entire number becomes 119, or 911 backwards. If you add the numbers up, 1 + 1 + 3 + 6, you get 11. This room is on the 11th floor. So we have 3 elevens and a 9. That may mean nothing, but I just thought it was a bit too strange not to mention. And being that Cornell's mother is a numerologist, I imagine she probably has some thoughts on this as well. But she has remained completely silent on this topic publicly, which could indicate many things, nothing of which I will attempt to guess at here.

"Soundgarden Guitarist Blasts Chris Cornell Murder Conspiracy Theories" - Rock997.com

You may have seen this headline in a few different places online. Here's the ONLY QUOTE attributed to Kim Thayil [Soundgarden guitarist] in that article, which is absurdly short, and is paraphrased:

"Thayil says nobody saw anything “that would have allowed us to anticipate what would happen.” He said the show that night had a few early challenges but that it went fine after those were smoothed out."

So who is Thayil "blasting" there? All he basically said was that nobody saw Cornell's death coming. How does that translate to him "blasting" conspiracy theorists? It is actually the author of the article's words that are "blasting" imaginary conspiracy theorists, NOT Thayil's. Clearly, the headline of the article is supposed to support the "popular consensus" regarding Cornell's death, but the actual contents of the article are apparently not required to support what the headline is stating. The article relies upon the assumption that "well, you already know he killed himself," rather than holding itself to actually backing up, with Thayil's quotes, what the headline states.

"SOUNDGARDEN Guitarist Dismisses CHRIS CORNELL Murder Conspiracy Theories" - Blabbermouth.com

Again, we have a headline citing the same Detroit Free Press article, stating something that isn't made obvious in the article itself by Thayil, but by the person who wrote the article. Here is the quote included in the Blabbermouth article referenced above:

"Thayil also addressed what he called "cockamamie ideas floating around out there" — conspiracy theories that hit the web after Cornell's death, such as speculation the singer was murdered because he was about to expose a child sex ring allegedly associated with a Washington, D.C., pizza parlor some claimed was a front, although Washington police said that theory was "fictitious.""

Thayil's entire quote is "...cockamamie ideas floating around out there." It's not even a complete sentence! One would think that if he had these strong feelings about the awful "conspiracy theorists" out there, he'd manage to complete a sentence making his feelings on the matter unquestionable, in his own words. This guy has a degree in philosophy, I'm sure he's got an articulate opinion on this subject. We certainly aren't getting it from these fragments of his quotes, paraphrased in articles where the author's words alone are supporting what the headline says.

"Thayil's tone sharpens with anger when he references "the cockamamie ideas floating around out there" — conspiracy theories that hit the web after Cornell's death, such as speculation the singer was murdered because he was about to expose a pedophile ring.... "There were a few minor difficulties (early) in the show that I felt adjusted themselves within a few songs," Thayil says of Cornell's Fox performance. "And then the rest of the show went pretty well."..."The fact of the matter is there was nothing that would suggest this outcome," he says." - Freep.com

Above is a quote from the Detroit Free Press, where all of these articles are supposedly getting their information from. We've got the "cockamamie" fragment, heavily paraphrased again by the author in the article. Thayil didn't directly address any "conspiracy theorists" who think Cornell was murdered - it was the author of the article who mentions these things.

""The fact of the matter is there was nothing that would suggest this outcome," he says."

Here we have a complete sentence, but without knowing what was discussed previous to this quote, we don't really know what Thayil means by "outcome." We assume he is referring to Cornell's suicide, but he never states that in his own words. Why didn't they just publish the entire interview instead of these sound bytes paraphrased with more of the author's wording than the subject's? Obviously Thayil never gave the answers these "journalists" wanted, so they took snippets of his answers and filled in the rest themselves. There's no quote from him in these articles directly stating "people who think Cornell was murdered are nuts." I didn't see any quote from Thayil clearly stating "I do not believe Cornell was murdered." Do you think people are asking him this question? Of course they are, wouldn't he want to set the record straight? The article is presenting the quote as being ASSUMPTIVE of Cornell's suicide - without being able to come up with 1 complete sentence from Thayil clearly supporting this presumed fact. There simply isn't enough dialogue from Thayil in the article to determine where he stands exactly. I could take that same last quote, write a headline that says "Thayil never expected murder," and it would still make sense!

Recall Vicky Cornell's statements about how everybody supposedly knew something was off with Cornell that night before he died. Doesn't sound like Thayil shares that view from the above. He said "nothing" would suggest this outcome. He didn't say anything about a "relapse," about his voice being way off, or about any head injuries. He was on the damned stage with Cornell all night, I think he woulda saw a wound on the back of Cornell's head before people on Youtube spotted it! There were no indications because he was fine and had no intention of taking his own life.

IN CONCLUSION

"Lynch: to put to death (as by hanging) by mob action without legal approval or permission" - Merriam-Webster's Dictionary

Americans typically associate lynching with racial hatred for obvious historical reasons. But as we can see, a lynching doesn't necessarily have to involve race. What a lynching does is it sends a distinct message of hatred towards the victim, and anyone who might sympathize with them. I'm sure whoever wanted Cornell dead could have made it look much cleaner than this. I believe Cornell's death was supposed to look a little suspicious because someone wanted to send a message to those "in the know," regarding whatever it was he got himself into. I don't know much about Chester Bennington, but all I really need to know is that he was a friend of Cornell's, sang a song at his wake, then ended up dead at the end of a rope on Cornell's birthday just a couple months later. They called it suicide, I call it a very clear message: "Don't talk."

"...and so we kind of decided well lets use my celebrity and the fact that I have a fan base in an effective way to try to help some kids...it's like real easy for me, so the idea is just to recognize that and realize that I am in a privileged position to be able to help without really having to go that far out of my way, and then make sure that I am consistently doing that. Cause one day I won't be able to do that and I'll have wasted that opportunity to help some children that need it." Cornell on KLOS, 2015

CLICK TO READ PART I
CLICK TO READ PART II

Chris Cornell's Bodyguard: 2020 Interview

You might also be interested in the blog I did regarding THE DIMEBAG DARRELL MURDER

This blog was researched, written, and continues to be maintained by 1 person. If you enjoyed it and would like to encourage more of them, donations can be made by clicking the button below.