If you've read part 1 you may have noticed that 9 years have gone by as of the day this one was posted. I didn't plan on doing a follow-up but I've stumbled across some information that, while not exactly abundant, is rather shocking. Shocking in the sense that it supports the conspiratorial angle I explore in-depth in part 1 eerily well - which is slightly ironic because I thought I went a little overboard upon a recent re-reading of it! And while none of what I'm about to get into is really NEW, I don't know that anyone else has put these peices together in the way I am about to here.
Though plenty of horriffic things have unfortunately occured in the last 9 years since I first wrote about this incident, Friday November 13th 2015 at Le Bataclan remains the deadliest concert shooting in history with about 89 casualties. For that reason alone, I think it deserves a bit more attention than it gets from the average concert-goer.
Some may find my lines of questioning and theorizing absurd, offensive, or insensitive. I'm not asking anyone to prescribe to my theories or LIKE my opinions, but I do ask the reader to take care and notice the difference between factual information I present and opinions/conjecture. Despite how it may sound, I know the difference and I hope you do as well.
PAPER GODS
Let's talk about Duran Duran's album "Paper Gods," released September 11th, 2015...Wait, hold on...what date was it released on? Ah, who cares I'm sure it means nothing! I mean, look at the album cover - do you see the twin towers on there? No, it's a bunch of cutout images referencing various hits in DD's career, right? You got the Sumo Wrestler from "Girls on Film," the painted lips from the cover of "Rio," the chauffer cap from "The Chauffeur," and so on, no conspiracies here!
As mentioned in part 1, if you remember, Le Bataclan was sold on 9.11.2015, just 2 months before the attacks [Wait, the SAME 9.11 that Duran Duran released their album? Yes, the same day]. Considering Le Bataclan had the same owners for almost 40 years before that sale, it seems a bit strangely timed. You might also remember who the owners Joel and Pascal Laloux [Jews] sold the place to?
According to Lagardere's own website "history" section, one of their subsidaries "Matra BAe Dynamics" was "the leading weapons manufacturer in Europe and the third largest in the world" as of 1996. Obviouosly, this is a very large corporation and they have had their hands in many bowls all over the place, like many other large corporations. But in September of 2015, they changed their name to Lagardère Sports and Entertainment. I'm not sure why, but something about the segue from "leading weapons manufacturer" to "sports and entertainment producer" just doesn't sit that well with me, I don't know about you.
So who cares right? Well, as I stated in part 1, Qatar owned 70% of Lagardère at the time. Qatar is a known funder of the Muslim Brotherhood. And although the Brotherhood and Isis/Isil are allegedly enemies, that doesn't mean that Qatar isn't funding them as well. This is backed up by a wikileaks revealed email between Hillary Clinton and John Podesta which reads in part that Qatar AND the Saudis were “providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL.” Isis/Isil claimed credit for the deadly Le Bataclan shooting. This means that the largest shareholder of the company that purchased Le Bataclan on 9.11.2015 was potentially FUNDING the very same group who claimed credit for shooting it up! While I'm sure the trusty authorities and the mainstream media would NEVER lie to us or withold information regarding such a horriffic incident, maybe we shouldn't feel so bad about asking more probing questions instead of just going "YEAH, OK THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED CASE CLOSED!"
Why does it matter that the former owners of the club were Jews and why did I point that out? Because Muslim extremists want to kill/enslave all Jews, Christians, and anyone else who doesn't worship Allah! So yeah, it seems kind of odd that the former owners, who'd gotten anti-semetic threats before, would sell to a company with ties to Qatar on 9.11.2015 after almost 40 years of owning it.
[Track listing for the album "Paper Gods" taken from duranduran.co.kr]
So what do you think now, should we look a little closer at this "Paper Gods" album which came out the same day Le Bataclan was sold to funders of Isis/Isil? Are the lyrics along the lines of "Girls on Film" and "Hungry like the Wolf?" Actually, no, they are decidedly dark! While I'd certainly encourage you to look these lines up and see them in context, here's a few creepier ones to consider...
Bleeding from paper cuts, money for head shots
And when the final curtain finally comes down
We’ll all be in the party room, no wiser as to how
The above lines were taken from the title track, "Paper Gods." "Head Shots" is a reference to promotional photos. It's also something that happened more literally at Le Bataclan on 11.13.2015.
The negative themes of money and materialism seems to fall into that "criticising the industry" category so many big rock bands get into sooner or later. In this case, are we talking about a particularly BAD deal?
The 2nd couple lines reminds me a little bit of Prince's 1999 lyrical concept. The ship's going down? Might as well throw a party!
Sadly, the deceased concertgoers of Le Bataclan really should have been made aware ahead of time that the previously Jewish owned venue had threats made against it recently. Terrorist attacks began that night a good 15 minutes before at another location in Paris, so it's hard to buy the idea that no diligent individual was aware of, or took action once the nearby threat was underway.
We’re gonna live this night, ye-yeah
Live it like it’s our last night
Cause nobody cares
If there’s no tomorrow
The title of the song from which the above lyrics were taken is "Last Night in the City."
I could spend an entire blog taking these lyrics apart, but there's no need to belabor the point, I think you know what I'm getting at. None of this proves anything nefarious, it's just some disturbing, perhaps necessary stuff to consider.
On October 2nd, 2015 the Eagles of Death Metal released their 4th album, "Zipper Down." On this album they recorded "Save a Prayer," which is a Duran Duran cover tune. Later that month on October 30th the band EODM appear on the UK's TFI Friday. Duran Duran joins them onstage for a performance of the song "Save a Prayer."
Why am I explaining all of this? Because a connection is being made between Duran Duran and the Eagles of Death metal - a fun sort of "joke band" from the California desert. Doesn't that seem like kind of an odd pairing that sort of comes out of nowhere? Duran Duran owes this band nothing, they are one of the biggest pop rock bands of all time, they don't really need to try and capitalize on a lesser known band like EODM covering one of their tunes, do they? There doesn't seem to be any business connection there either, other than licencing the song out.
On November 16th, just 3 days after the Le Bateclan massacre, Simon Le Bon announced the band’s support for a fundraising campaign via Twitter, where royalties from The Eagle's of Death Metal's cover song for "Save a Prayer" would be donated to families of the Paris attack victims.
"British fans have launched a campaign to make Eagles of Death Metal's cover version of Duran Duran's Save A Prayer number one on the UK music charts, as a show of support after the attacks at the band's show in Paris on Friday." - cbc.ca
I mentioned this in part 1, and I'm gonna double down here - yeah, this sounds real nice and stuff but it also sounds kind of like a promotional REWARD for something. 2 things can be true at the same time. Maybe money was raised for victims in good faith here and maybe this was ALSO Duran Duran rewarding EODM for taking part in something.
REAP J LAM
If you follow my material often, you may recall a theory I have which is call "Reap J Lam", an anagram of the band name "Pearl Jam". It's really just my version of the old myth that one must make a deal with the devil for fame and fortune. Personally, I don't think it's a myth, but my version is based on the idea that Andrew Wood, of Mother Love Bone, was sacrificed for Pearl Jam's fame and fortune [will provide link below expanding upon this].
If a sacrifice is generally required for fame and fortune, what was Duran Duran's sacrifice? I realize it's a terrible question, but for what it's worth, I'm not accusing Simon Le Bon or any other member of Duran Duran of being responsible for the 2015 Le Bataclan shootings. I'm accusing the devil, who operates within the entertainment industry and beyond. Who deceives young musicians into signing their name on a contract he knows they haven't read or properly understood. Who comes to collect a debt from someone who didn't read the fine print.
Did you know that Simon Le Bon almost died on August 11th, 1985 in a freak Yacht related accident?
"A structural design failure caused the vessel's heavy keel to snap off, instantly capsizing the yacht. While 18 crew members managed to scramble onto the upturned hull, Le Bon and five others were trapped below decks in a rapidly shrinking air pocket filled with dangerous diesel fumes and battery acid. During his underwater escape, Le Bon's pants snagged on a piece of the boat, forcing him to take them off under the water. He was famously hoisted into the helicopter wearing only his underwear, an image that became a worldwide sensation." - Google A.I.
For a keel to "shear off" of a brand new Yacht is exceedingly rare, according to my reliable friend who would NEVER lie, Google A.I. Simon Le Bon was quite rich in the year 1985 and he apparently paid Ron Holland to design his Yacht, a guy with a reputation for making Superyachts for competative racing. This isn't a guy who's gonna screw up a boat so bad that the keel shears off fresh out of the factory! And yet, the primary cause of the accident seems to be a somewhat convoluted and vaguely designated "design error."
One of the excuses for this "quality control failure" is due to the fact that the vessel was originally commissioned by sailor Rob James, who tragically drowned before construction began. The project was halted and sold to Simon Le Bon. The disjointed construction process is what is being blamed for the structural flaw in attaching the keel [Apparently, it was never correctly or fully attached to the hull's internal framework]. But what I don't quite understand exactly is how the construction process was "disjointed," when it didn't even begin until after James passed away? There were no "half built" sections to be re-evaluated. And given the amount of money, the high profile clients involved, and the skills of Ron Holland - I would think the construction process would have been well looked after from start to finish! But perhaps there is more to the story which makes this make more sense...
[Rob James, "an immensely experienced sailor" - sailinganarchy.com]
It seems that Simon Le Bon's "freak accident" was connected to another one, by way of the late Rob James.
"Rob was an immensely experienced sailor but ironically it was he who died in a freak accident. Rob and his crew had just delivered his 60-foot trimaran from Cowes to Salcombe on the south coast of England when he went forward to drop the mainsail and fell into the water. By all accounts it was pretty calm but it took the crew an hour and forty-five minutes to locate and recover his body." - sailinganarchy.com
Apparently, some sort of netting failed, causing James to plummet down into the water, but this doesn't really tell us HOW he died. Surely he could swim, being an "immensely experienced sailor." And he wasn't alone, attempts were made by his crew to throw him a "life ring." The water was relatively calm that morning, so how did he drown and why did it take an hour and 45 minutes to find/fish his body out?
Although the official cause of death appears to be "drowning," a noted compounding factor was BLUNT FORCE TRAUMA. In other words, he was hit in the head before hitting the water, likely passed out, and therefore compromised his ability to swim, in theory. This blunt force trauma is assumed to have been caused by him banging up against something as he fell down through the net, but how do we know someone didn't just clock him over the head before throwing him into the water?
It's fair to say that both the failing safety net and the failing keel are both exceedingly rare occurances. So now I'm wondering, was Rob James' dream Yacht rigged to actually CAUSE the "freak accident" which nearly claimed Simon Le Bon's life and 5 others. Was he the intended sacrifice for the band's fame and fortune initially? It's usually the singer isn't it?
Here's the pattern I see, and I'm not claiming it's proof of anything, but here goes...
Typically the way the "sacrifice ritual" potentially works is that the death needs to occur in a very public way and a strong connection must be established between the band and the one sacrificed. For example:
Legend has it, the last words spoken between Vinnie and Darrell "Dimebag" Abbott just before Dimebag was murdered on stage was VAN HALEN. A visibly drunken Eddie Van Halen then attended Dimebag's funeral and placed his iconic "bumblebee" guitar inside Dimebag's coffin, before a shocked crowd. That established the connection between Dimebag's death and Van Halen pretty dramatically and very publicly.
In the case of the Le Bataclan slaughter, I'm looking at the date the club was sold, 9.11.15. This was of course the 14-year anniversary of the 911 attacks, which we were told were committed by Muslim extremists. We were also told Muslim extremists were responsible for the attack on Le Bataclan.
Then we have Duran Duran's "Paper Gods" album, released on the same day the club was sold, 9.11.15. This creates a link between the album, the club's NEW owners [Lagardere/Qatar], and the terrorist attacks of 9.11.2001. The album cover features images from their various hits throughout the years. It reminds you of all the band's hits, their fame, their fortune - Highlighting their successes, almost the way a "best of" album cover would, except this isn't a "best of" album. The "Paper Gods" being a reminder of the contracts signed, and the "gods" those contracts serve. The lyrics make eerie references to a final night out in the party room, and pretty clear references to death afterwards.
The Eagles of Death Metal release their album the same year, and include a Duran Duran cover. This establishes a link between the Eagles of Death Metal and Duran Duran BEFORE the incident. They then appear TOGETHER on a popular UK show and perform the song together, further linking them in a very public way.
The terrorist attacks occur on Friday the 13th, which tells us that dates are important to the sick individuals who planned this slaughter. It might be wise to pay attention to such details, rather than just laughing them off as insignifficant.
2 days after the attacks, the campaign to boost TEODM's Duran Duran cover to #1, which is backed by the band publicly, then directly connects the 2 bands and the massacre at Le Bataclan.
If I am correct, and this Reap J Lam theory carries weight, then I would say the slaughter at Le Bataclan was at least partially intended to serve as the sacrifice for Duran Duran's fame and fortune, and probably Josh Homme as well, being that he is the real establishment force behind the Eagles of Death Metal, Queens of the Stoneage, and Kyuss.
This blog was researched, written, and continues to be maintained by 1 person. If you enjoyed it and would like to encourage more of them, donations can be made by clicking the button below.
No comments:
Post a Comment