If you've read part 1 you may have noticed that 9 years have gone by as of the day this one was posted. I didn't plan on doing a follow-up but I've stumbled across some information that, while not exactly abundant, is rather shocking. Shocking in the sense that it supports the conspiratorial angle I explore in-depth in part 1 eerily well - which is slightly ironic because I thought I went a little overboard upon a recent re-reading of it! And while none of what I'm about to get into is really NEW, I don't know that anyone else has put these peices together in the way I am about to here.
Though plenty of horriffic things have unfortunately occured in the last 9 years since I first wrote about this incident, Friday November 13th 2015 at Le Bataclan remains the deadliest concert shooting in history with about 89 casualties. For that reason alone, I think it deserves a bit more attention than it gets from the average concert-goer.
Some may find my lines of questioning and theorizing absurd, offensive, or insensitive. I'm not asking anyone to prescribe to my theories or LIKE my opinions, but I do ask the reader to take care and notice the difference between factual information I present and opinions/conjecture. Despite how it may sound, I know the difference and I hope you do as well.
PAPER GODS
Let's talk about Duran Duran's album "Paper Gods," released September 11th, 2015...Wait, hold on...what date was it released on? Ah, who cares I'm sure it means nothing! I mean, look at the album cover - do you see the twin towers on there? No, it's a bunch of cutout images referencing various hits in DD's career, right? You got the Sumo Wrestler from "Girls on Film," the painted lips from the cover of "Rio," the chauffer cap from "The Chauffeur," and so on, no conspiracies here!
As mentioned in part 1, if you remember, Le Bataclan was sold on 9.11.2015, just 2 months before the attacks [Wait, the SAME 9.11 that Duran Duran released their album? Yes, the same day]. Considering Le Bataclan had the same owners for almost 40 years before that sale, it seems a bit strangely timed. You might also remember who the owners Joel and Pascal Laloux [Jews] sold the place to?
When I posted part 1, Lagardere's website "history" section noted one of their subsidaries "Matra BAe Dynamics" was "the leading weapons manufacturer in Europe and the third largest in the world" as of 1996. Like many other large corporations they have had their hands in many bowls all over the place, but in September of 2015, they changed their name to Lagardère Sports and Entertainment. I'm not sure why, but something about the segue from "leading weapons manufacturer" to "sports and entertainment producer" just doesn't sit that well with me, I don't know about you.
So who cares right? Well, as I stated in part 1, Qatar owned 70% of Lagardère at the time. Qatar is a known funder of the Muslim Brotherhood. And although the Brotherhood and Isis/Isil are allegedly enemies, that doesn't mean that Qatar isn't funding them as well. This is backed up by a wikileaks revealed email between Hillary Clinton and John Podesta which reads in part that Qatar AND the Saudis were “providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL.” Isis/Isil claimed credit for the deadly Le Bataclan shooting. This means that the largest shareholder of the company that purchased Le Bataclan on 9.11.2015 was potentially FUNDING the very same group who claimed credit for shooting it up!
It behooves conspirators of large crimes such as this to promote a climate of shame towards those who would dare promote "baseless conspiracy theories" such as mine. But clearly, our habitual blind acceptance of the mainstream media narrative surrounding events such as this only seems to lead us right into the next one. And so I think a good first step here is to interrupt this psychological pattern and at least acknowledge that we as a people have largely lost the ability to differentiate between "entertainment" and "propaganda." We must wake up to the fact that this is a huge victory for the enemy and gives them great power to pull off huge crimes and face no accountability!
[Track listing for the album "Paper Gods" taken from duranduran.co.kr]
So what do you think now, should we look a little closer at this "Paper Gods" album which came out the same day Le Bataclan was sold to funders of Isis/Isil? Are the lyrics along the lines of "Girls on Film" and "Hungry like the Wolf?" Actually, no, they are decidedly dark! While I'd certainly encourage you to look these lines up and see them in context, here's a few creepier ones taken from the title track, "Paper Gods."
Bleeding from paper cuts, money for head shots
The concept behind this album feels to me like some form of criticism of the industry behind the music and entertainment business - fairly common territory for bigger bands to inevitable arrive at. Using creative metaphors and pop-laden melodic lines make this a perfect way to sort of keep things viable pop-wise, but also satisfy the need for a band to express something "artistically honest".
"Paper" in this context represents bureaucracy, traditionally symbolized by endless stacks of contracts, legal notices, and money. To be bleeding from proverbial "paper cuts" could easily be a reference to bloodshed as a result of a particulary bad contract or financial transaction. While "head shots" is a known type of promotional photo, it's also graphically relavant in a more literal sense with regard to the Bataclan massacre. So yes, I would say that short line is quite loaded!
And when the final curtain finally comes down
We'll all be in the party room, no wiser as to how
As in a traditional theatre play or even an old school cinema room, curtains coming down signify the end of the show, an intermission, or segue into the next scene. It means "the end," possibly for now, possibly forever. Death.
The "party room," the "concert hall," the "dance club" - pick your location where a crowd "no wiser" as to their imminent demise congregates. If we're talking about the "party room" at Le Bataclan, well - there was 24 minutes from the initial terrorist attacks at another location in Paris before the shooting began at the sold out Eagles of Death Metal show. People had smart phones in 2015. This club had recieved threats of an anti-semetic nature before. There's no reason security at the club should have been unprepared for such an attack. At the very least, SOMEONE had to have been alerted during that 24 minute gap that shootings began not so far away! And as I mentioned in part 1, Jesse Hughes was quoted publicly for stating he thought something seemed off about security that night. And so the song could be interpreted as highlighting the fact that the crowd was so oblivious, when they really should not have been.
Here are some lines from the song "Last Night in the City"...
We’re gonna live this night, ye-yeah
Live it like it’s our last night
Cause nobody cares
If there’s no tomorrow
To live a night as if it is you LAST is a way to poke fun at the inevitable fact that we are all gonna die someday, so we might as well have some fun before then. This is similar in theme to Prince's 80s hit "1999." Remember how people were freaking out about what would happen when the year 2000 arrived? I do.
I don't wanna belabor the point, but clearly some of these lyrics are eerily relavant to the Le Bataclan attack. On it's own this doesn't really prove anything, but taken into account with other details in this blog, it reveals something that is at least worth contemplating seriously for a minute. It's not a crime to think out loud and in public, even if it pisses some people off!
On October 2nd, 2015 the Eagles of Death Metal released their 4th album, "Zipper Down." On this album they recorded "Save a Prayer," which is a Duran Duran cover tune. Later that month on October 30th the band EODM appear on the UK's TFI Friday. Duran Duran joins them onstage for a performance of the song "Save a Prayer."
What I'm trying to highlight here is the very deliberate public connection being made between Duran Duran and the Eagles of Death metal - the latter being a fun little "joke band" from the California desert - who seem to have enjoyed an extraoridinary amount of mainstream support, as documented in part 1. Doesn't that seem like kind of an odd pairing that sort of comes out of nowhere? Duran Duran owes this band nothing, they are one of the biggest pop rock bands of all time, they don't really need to try and capitalize on a lesser known band like EODM covering one of their tunes, do they? There doesn't seem to be any business or direct management connection there either, other than licencing the song out.
On November 16th, just 3 days after the Le Bateclan massacre, Simon Le Bon announced the band’s support for a fundraising campaign via Twitter, where royalties from The Eagle's of Death Metal's cover song for "Save a Prayer" would be donated to families of the Paris attack victims.
"British fans have launched a campaign to make Eagles of Death Metal's cover version of Duran Duran's Save A Prayer number one on the UK music charts, as a show of support after the attacks at the band's show in Paris on Friday." - cbc.ca
I mentioned this in part 1, and I'm gonna double down here: yeah, this sounds like a real nice gesture of charity and solidarity but it also appears to be a promotional REWARD to EODM for something. 2 things can be true at the same time. Maybe money was raised for victims in good faith here and maybe this was ALSO Duran Duran rewarding EODM for taking part in something.
REAP J LAM
If you follow my material often, you may recall a theory I have which is call "Reap J Lam", an anagram of the band name "Pearl Jam". It's really just my version of the old myth that one must make a deal with the devil for fame and fortune. Personally, I don't think it's a myth, but my version is based on the idea that Andrew Wood, of Mother Love Bone, was sacrificed for Pearl Jam's fame and fortune [will provide link below expanding upon this].
If a sacrifice is generally required for fame and fortune, what was Duran Duran's sacrifice? I realize it's a terrible question, but for what it's worth, I'm not accusing Simon Le Bon or any other member of Duran Duran of being responsible for the 2015 Le Bataclan shootings. I'm accusing the devil, who operates within the entertainment industry and beyond. Who deceives young musicians into signing their name on a contract he knows they haven't read or properly understood. Who comes to collect a debt from someone who didn't read the fine print.
Did you know that Simon Le Bon almost died on August 11th, 1985 in a freak Yacht related accident?
"A structural design failure caused the vessel's heavy keel to snap off, instantly capsizing the yacht. While 18 crew members managed to scramble onto the upturned hull, Le Bon and five others were trapped below decks in a rapidly shrinking air pocket filled with dangerous diesel fumes and battery acid. During his underwater escape, Le Bon's pants snagged on a piece of the boat, forcing him to take them off under the water. He was famously hoisted into the helicopter wearing only his underwear, an image that became a worldwide sensation." - Google A.I.
For a keel to "shear off" of a brand new Yacht is exceedingly rare, according to my reliable friend who would NEVER lie, Google A.I. Simon Le Bon was quite rich in the year 1985 and he apparently paid Ron Holland to design his Yacht, a guy with a reputation for making Superyachts for competative racing. This isn't a guy who's gonna screw up a boat so bad that the keel shears off fresh out of the factory! And yet, the primary cause of the accident seems to be a somewhat convoluted and vaguely designated "design error."
One of the excuses for this "quality control failure" is due to the fact that the vessel was originally commissioned by sailor Rob James, who tragically drowned before construction began. The project was halted and sold to Simon Le Bon. The disjointed construction process is what is being blamed for the structural flaw in attaching the keel [Apparently, it was never correctly or fully attached to the hull's internal framework]. But what I don't quite understand exactly is how the construction process was "disjointed," when it didn't even begin until after James passed away? There were no "half built" sections to be re-evaluated. And given the amount of money, the high profile clients involved, and the skills of Ron Holland - I would think the construction process would have been well looked after from start to finish! But perhaps there is more to the story which makes this make more sense...
[Rob James, "an immensely experienced sailor" - sailinganarchy.com]
It seems that Simon Le Bon's "freak accident" was connected to another one, by way of the late Rob James.
"Rob was an immensely experienced sailor but ironically it was he who died in a freak accident. Rob and his crew had just delivered his 60-foot trimaran from Cowes to Salcombe on the south coast of England when he went forward to drop the mainsail and fell into the water. By all accounts it was pretty calm but it took the crew an hour and forty-five minutes to locate and recover his body." - sailinganarchy.com
Apparently, some sort of netting failed [which NEVER happens in this manner by the way], causing James to plummet down into the water. But this doesn't really tell us HOW he died. Surely he could swim, being an "immensely experienced sailor." And he wasn't alone, attempts were made by his crew to throw him a "life ring." The water was relatively calm that morning, so how did he drown and why did it take an hour and 45 minutes to find/fish his body out?
Although the official cause of death appears to be "drowning," a noted compounding factor was BLUNT FORCE TRAUMA. In other words, he was hit in the head before hitting the water, likely passed out, and therefore compromised his ability to swim and for people to find him. This blunt force trauma is assumed to have been caused by him banging up against something as he fell down through the net, but how do we know someone didn't just clock him over the head before throwing him into the water?
It's fair to say that both the failing safety net and the failing keel are both exceedingly rare occurances statistically. So now I'm wondering, was Rob James' dream Yacht rigged to actually CAUSE the "freak accident" which nearly claimed Simon Le Bon's life and 5 others. Was he the intended sacrifice for the band's fame and fortune initially?
Here's the pattern I see, and I'm not claiming it's proof of anything, but here goes...
Typically the way the "sacrifice ritual" potentially works is that the death needs to occur in a very public way and a strong connection must be established between the band and the one sacrificed. In other words, it must be made obvious on some level who was sacrificed for whom. But there also must be a strong level of plausible deniability present for the mainstream media to latch onto. The mainstream media will then promote ONLY the denial narrative and either completely ignore or ridicule the occult narrative. For example:
Legend has it, the last words spoken between Vinnie and Darrell "Dimebag" Abbott just before Dimebag was murdered on stage were "VAN HALEN". A visibly drunken Eddie Van Halen then attended Dimebag's funeral and placed his iconic "bumblebee" guitar inside Dimebag's coffin, before a shocked crowd. Someone close to Dimebag was quoted as saying that if he knew Eddie would do that, Dimebag would say "kill me now!" All this established the connection between Dimebag's death and Van Halen pretty dramatically and very publicly. A suitable sacrifice with plenty of plausible deniability baked in.
The Le Bataclan situation was a little more involved because I think it served multiple agendas, one of which was sacrificial. I'm first looking at the date the club was sold, 9.11.15. This was of course the 14-year anniversary of the WTC 911 attacks, which we were told were committed by Muslim extremists. We were also told Muslim extremists were responsible for the attack on Le Bataclan. The motivation for Muslim extremists to choose such a date seems obvious, and probably should lead one to at least consider who booked the show and what their other connections might be to the event.
Then we have Duran Duran's "Paper Gods" album, released on the same day the club was sold, 9.11.15. This creates a pattern link between the album, the sale of the club to its' NEW owners [Lagardere/Qatar], and the terrorist attacks of 9.11.2001. The album cover features images from DD's various hits throughout the years, recalling their fame and fortune and where it came from initially. This might make sense on the front of a "best of" album, and I am sure the band has a perfectly sensible explanation as to why these images were chosen for their [at the time] new album. But the combination of these images with the "Paper Gods" themes of paper contracts, money, blood, divine forces and death alludes to the COST of it all, and to whom it is due.
The Eagles of Death Metal release their album the same year, and include a Duran Duran cover. They then appear TOGETHER on a popular UK show and perform the song together, further linking them in a very public way. This promotional campaign sets a strong public link between the 2 groups BEFORE the incident at Le Bataclan, so that their connections during the aftermath can function perfectly as a the necesarry fanfare of an occult mission accomplished, while also creating a level of plausible deniability [it's all for charity] without anyone suspecting the REAL reason for the fanfare.
If I am correct, and this Reap J Lam theory carries weight, then I would say the slaughter at Le Bataclan was at least partially intended to serve as the sacrifice for Duran Duran's fame and fortune over the years, and probably Josh Homme's carreer as well, being that he is the real establishment force behind the Eagles of Death Metal, Queens of the Stoneage, and Kyuss.
This blog was researched, written, and continues to be maintained by 1 person. If you enjoyed it and would like to encourage more of them, donations can be made by clicking the button below.













































