Monday, January 16, 2023

Operation: Death Con 3 [PT II: Censored]

Dave Chappelle

SNL

Drink Champs

[the above headings are to help the search algorithms connect people to this page]

In part one I wrote about Dave Chappelle's recent monologue on Saturday Night Live, and how it was basically the deep state talking through him, and using him to manipulate his audience's views covertly. In part 2, I was planning on getting into a recent Alex Jones episode that touches on, and expands upon many of these same points - but since part one has gotten VERY FEW hits - this has caused me to wonder whether it is being censored by Google's algorithms. So rather than waste my time on a second half which may get heavily censored as well, I decided to paste part 1 here again, but with certain words/phrases abbreviated to see if I can trick the Google algorithms and allow for "normal" traffic. If this one gets way more hits, that obviously points to an algorithm designed to censor or "shadow ban" certain words/phrases.

The above image contains a KEY of words and phrases I believe Google is probably flagging heavily and trying to censor, or at least monitor. I have removed all of the words/phrases you see in the image above, and replaced them with the abbreviations you see representing them. This should be obvious while you read the blog, but hopefully it is not too irritating on the eyes. If so, simply read part 1 instead, as it is the exact same blog without abbreviations [find link to part 1 by clicking on January 2023 within the column on the right of this page]. I have also removed the source links from this page as a precaution, so again, refer to part 1 for those links as well...

Regarding a recent opening monologue Dave Chappelle did on Saturday Night Live, Dailymail.com published a story on November 14th that "Dave Chappelle kept NBC and the producers of Saturday Night Live guessing up until the last moment when he reportedly performed a new version of his monologue for the live broadcast...The 49-year-old comedian performed a 'fake' version of his monologue for the dress rehearsal earlier on Saturday evening, before doing a different monologue that didn't get anyone's approval for the show that appeared on television, sources told Page Six on Monday."

We really have no way of confirming whether this Dailymail.com article is pulling our leg or not, but a closer look at Chappelle's monologue reveales why it matters. If he said things "without approval" from his scriptwriters/financiers - he'd be culpable for it. But if he did indeed stick to the script, this points the finger at those putting the words in his mouth. And who are "THEY" anyway?

Chappelle starts out reading from a crumpled piece of paper pulled from his pocket, which seems intended to make it appear as though it was some last minute thing he decided to throw in spontaneously. He states in part that "I denounce anti-semetism in all it's forms." Why did he open his monologue this way, even jokingly? The implication seems to be that he is afraid of being branded an "anti-semite," and that he fears the consequences of such a branding.

The statement ends with: "and THAT, XXXXX [KW], is how you buy yourself some time..." Time from what? An imminent retaliation from those who believe he is an anti-semite?

"Early in my career I learned that there are 2 words in the English language that you should never say together in sequence. And those words are XXX and XXXX [TJs]. Never heard someone do good after they said that."

If we take the "comedy" out of Chappelle's statement, what's he really saying? Let me translate: "If you are in the entertainment industry, don't talk bad about XXX XXXX [TJs], or else..." This indicates to me pretty clearly that Chappelle is straight up enforcing the stereotype that a powerful group of XXXX [TJs] run the entertainment industry and that you better not talk bad about them if you wanna have a career in that field. Isn't that pretty much the same thing XXXXX [KW] has been saying, albeit less deceptively and with less humor attached? And yet, the politically correct SNL crowd is applauding and laughing along, as if there is nothing at all anti-semetic about Chappelle's routine! Why is it ok for Chappelle to say these things in a comedy routine, but it's "anti-semitic" for XX [KW] to say it in other contexts?

"DEFCON is a defense alert state (numbered 1–5) used by the United States Armed Forces." - wiki

"[I] Can’t even remember how it started. Vaguely I remember it started with a Tweet. Strange Tweet…I’m a little sleepy. I’mma get me some rest but when I wake up, I’m gonna go def-con 3 on XXX XXXX [TJs]!…I was a little worried, “what is he going to do to XXX XXXX [TJs]?”

What does Chappelle mean when he says he can't remember how "it" started? What is "it?" What are we talking about here exactly? Almost sounds like XX [KW] and Chappelle are acting out some fake morality battle for the public. If this was some kinda deep state sponsored propaganda campaign, we might call it "Operation: Death Con 3."

To start with, there is no such thing as "Death Con 3." But clearly, XX [KW] was intending to at least partially reference the military Defcon system.

So if XX [KW] is preparing his "Defense readiness condition" against XXX XXXX [TJs], doesn't that assume a DEFENSIVE, rather than OFFENSIVE position? Was he anticipating an ATTACK from "XXX XXXX [TJs]?" To further confuse the matter, he didn't say DEFCON 3, he said DEATH CON 3. We know what "DEATH" is. But a "CON" has to do with deception. If you sell someone a car that you claim runs perfectly, which you know needs a new transmission - that is a CON. Is XX [KW] indicating by way of word-play that there is some sort of deception going on?

XX [KW] addressed this "Death Con 3" Tweet recently on a Drink Champs podcast, where he comes off much more toned down, reasonable, and candid than he often does in other contexts. This shows how adept XX [KW] is at "switching gears" with his personality. Or maybe there's something deeper and more sinister going on in his head?

"what I meant to say was “no one’s afraid of XXX XXXXXX [TJs] media mob, which it is"

First of all, XX [KW] quotes his infamous Tweet as saying "Def Con 3," which it didn't - it said DEATH con 3. He tries to play it off like it was a spelling error and that he doesn't always articulate himself as well as he'd like online. Even tells a story about his father giving him advice on how to better articulate himself publicly. I don't buy it, but I highly suggest everyone go watch the entire podcast I am referencing here [link at the bottom] He says a whole lot of interesting things I don't have space to get into here...

XXXXX XXXX [KW] recently started going by "Y£," which is the 2nd half of his original first name. The part he removed is K-A-N. How is that pronounced when you say it? CON.

If you've ever watched the series "Outlander," the Scottish people portrayed in it say "Y£" when they mean "YOU." KAN...Y£ = CON...YOU? Removal of the 3 letters K-A-N = the death of Kan or DEATH CON 3?

The fact XXXXX [KW] cut his name in half tells you he gives his name and each of the letters LOTS of thought. Perhaps even more thought than most would assume...

"I believe 'Y£' is the most commonly used word in the Bible, and in the Bible it means 'you,' " West said during an interview with Big Boy in June 2018." - USA Today

XX's [KW's] infamous Tweet also stated that he "can't be anti-semetic because Black people are actually XXX [TJs]." To state that a XXX [TJ] cannot be anti-semetic makes no sense logically. And the idea that a Black person cannot be anti-semetic because they are all XXXX [TJs] makes even less sense!

Here's another interesting quote from XX's [KW's] Drink Champs appearance:

"Hey, you know, my people rise up, they [TJs] did something good, let’s copy what they're doin. Let’s rise up the way they rise up...we have to make our own empire. We have to get free just like XXX XXXX [TJs] did."

He also states at several points that he is jealous of XXX XXXX [TJs] and what they got, according to him. This all starts to get into a militant sort of Black Power/Black Panther [political party] mentality, which the mainstream has been aggressively promoting for a few years now. But you've gotta question the motives of the mainstream when they act like they wanna EMPOWER a specific group or race of people, while demonizing others who don't fit into that classification. That's not about equality, that's about control and "culling the herd."

"You guys have toyed with me and tried to blackball anyone whoever opposes your agenda"

[Image of a Freemasonic ballot box, taken from freemasonry.network]

"You guys" seems to be a continuation of XX's [KY's] suggestion that a group of powerful XXXX [TJs] are behind the entertainment industry, and are actually after XX [KW] himself.

The term "blackball" has a Freemasonic connotation. To "blackball" a candidate means to reject his membership. This is done by casting a black cube, which is an important symbol in ancient XXXXXX [TJs] mysticism as well. Is XX [KW] trying to say that he was "rejected" from membership of some elite Freemasonic organization? Sorta falls in line with the "I'm a famous guy rebelling against the elite" narrative. Again, I don't buy it, I think XX [KW] is a stone cold mind control slave for the elite, but I digress...

Back to David's SNL monologue:

"I grew up around XXXXXX [TJs] people. I have a lot of XXXXXX [TJs] friends, so I’m not freaked out by your culture…I know a little bit about it just from hangin around, be like “yo, let’s go out after school tomorrow!” They be like “we can’t go out it’s Sha Na Na tomorrow!” I be like, what? What is Sha Na Na?"

The joke seems to be that the phrase "Sha Na Na" sounds kinda like a XXXXXX [TJs] holiday like Rosh Hashana. But if you watch the video, DAVID Chappelle puts emphesis on the question "what is Sha Na Na?" Sha Na Na was a 50s Rock and Roll revival band who appeared at Woodstock, and later had a TV show which aired from 1977-1981. It's a reference only older people are probably going to get, so I assume it was aimed to grab their specific attention. This kinda sets up the next bit...

[Hasidic XXXX [TJs]]

[Run DMC]

[Weird Al Yankovic, from his video for the song "Amish Paradise," a spoof on Coolio's rap hit "Gangster's Paradise"]

"Why do some of your people dress like RUN DMC?"

The correlation Chappelle makes between RUN DMC's "look" and Hasidic XXXXXX [TJs] garb gets a good laugh from the crowd, but is there something much more deeply psychological going on here than it would at first seem?

"A year ago, I’d seen him on a podcast called “drink champs.” Great show…XXXXX [KW] said “only millionaires wear chains”…he said "I'm a billionare!"...He went on Drink Champs again…he said “I can say anti-semitic things…and Adidas can’t drop me!” Adidas dropped that nigga immediately. Ironically, Adidas was founded by Nazis."

[Slaves in a "Chain Gang"]

[RUN DMC, wearing their signature gold CHAINS...]

[RUN DMC, wearing their signature Adidas shoes, and jumpsuits. One of their most popular songs was "My Adidas."]

XXXX [TJs], anti-semitism, rappers, chains, adidas, Nazis, money, power, influence - what's the big picture Chappelle is painting here? I think there's something far more psychological happening with the language of his monologue than most people would suspect - and I think it is completely deliberate. The easiest way to break it all down and summarize, is to look at the symbolism here.

In the Thoth tarot deck, we see Adam and Eve [or Adam and Lilith?] after the fall, in the card called "The Devil." They appear to be chained up, so why do they look content? Happy even! The chains are loose, they can take them off anytime. But they PREFER the chains apparently. They PREFER to be satan's slaves? Perhaps they've been deceived into believing the chains are GOOD for them. That they are GOLD. Perhaps these rappers and rockstars and actors that we idolize and adore are all just slaves in a fancier package. Like high end prostitutes, trading in their souls to achieve fame and fortune. Is ANY reward worth trading in your soul for?

[Adolf Dassler, German founder of Adidas in the 1920s]

While the founding of Adidas in Germany seems to pre-date the Nazi party, Chappelle's comment that Adidas was "founded by Nazis" seems to ring somewhat true. In fact, the founder's name was Adolf!

"Both Dassler brothers joined the Nazi Party (NSDAP) in May 1933 and also became members of the National Socialist Motor Corps. Furthermore, Adolf took the rank of Sportwart in the Hitler Youth from 1935 until the end of the war. During the war, the company was running the last sport shoe factory in the country and predominantly supplied the Wehrmacht with shoes." - Wiki

Now obviously RUN DMC was either sponsored by, or were being paid by Adidas to represent them. This not only made Adidas alot of money, but cleared the company's reputation of being "racist" by having Black American rappers and their fans representing them. This may sound like uncomfortable stuff to contemplate, but if you owned a business as large as Adidas, you'd be thinking about this stuff too. Because at the end of the day, it's not about "empowering minorities," it's about MONEY, popularity, and perhaps a bit of social engineering. So yeah, I am not surprised they dropped XX [KW] for his "anti-semitic" comments. It probably had more to do with concerns about how they might be percieved by the PC public, than with XX's [KW's] "anti-semitism." Even if they did lose money by dropping him, it's the safe bet in the long run because getting branded an "anti-semitic sympathizer" could sink Adidas in a heartbeat. Cutting XX [KW] off was probably a "better safe than sorry" sort of gamble.

Back to Chappelle's monologue...

"He had broken the show business rules. You know, the rules of perception if they’re black then it’s a gang. If they’re Italian it’s the mob but if they’re XXXXXX [TJs] it’s a coincidence and you should never speak about it."

Again, it's kind of odd how obvious Chappelle is here in terms of acknowledging a powerful XXXXXX [TJs] presence at the center of the entertainment business. The very same type of observation that got XX [KW] branded "anti-semite." Maybe "XXX XXXX" ["TJs"] are writing Chappelle's script here because they WANT people to fear them? Maybe this is why Dailymail.com wants us to believe Chappelle went off script? Because if this is "all Chappelle talking," nobody can be accused of putting words in his mouth...

"I’ve been to Hollywood…It’s ALOT of XXXX [TJs]. Like ALOT. But that don’t mean anything. There’s a lot of black people in Ferguson, Missouri doesn’t mean they run the place…you could maybe adopt the dillusion that XXX XXXX [TJs] run show business, it’s not a crazy thing to think. But it’s a crazy thing to say out loud in a climate like this."

Allow me to translate David's "joke" here: Powerful XXXX [TJs] run Hollywood, but don't talk about it, if you know what's good for you. Especially you Black people!

[Herschel Walker, speaking at one of Trump's "Save America" rallies]

"Now that mid-terms are over and it’s crazy climate…the most ominous sign of mid-terms I believe would be Herschel Walker who I, I don’t wanna speak badly of because he’s black but I have to admit…he’s observably stupid. Even when he’s not talking his mouth be open a little bit…"

Chappelle says he doesn't wanna speak badly of Herschel Walker because he's black, which is a strange statement as it insinuates that he thinks Blacks should get special treatment over other races - which doesn't contribute to the idea of EQUALITY, it encourages ignorance and INEQUALITY among races. Yet, the PC SNL audience is just applauding and laughing away, as Chappelle disingenuously postures himself as "morally superior" to XXXXX XXXX [KW].

"Watching the news now they’re saying it’s the end of the Trump era…He’s what I call an honest liar…I’ve never seen a white male billionaire screaming at the top of his lungs, the whole system is rigged!…he said “I know the system is rigged because I use it” Then he pulled out an Illuminati membership card and chop a line of cocaine with it and did a line right there at the podium."

Chappelle's cheap and seemingly pointless bashing of Herschel Walker, a friend of Donald Trump, was obviously a segue into bashing the latter. Walker was merely a convenient "stepping stone" to get there, and bash one of the few prominent Patriotic Republican Blacks out there while he's at it... Allow me to translate again what Chappelle is saying here: "Trump is part of the deep state but at least he's honest about it and tells it like it is." Some people seemed to think this was a sort of rare compliment coming from someone on the mainstream left. But how is insinuating that Trump is just another member of the White House Illuminati cult a compliment? Methinks David is projecting here...

When it comes to making fun of the Government, Joe Biden is a REAL EASY TARGET. You'd think comedians would be clowning him left and right. Why aren't they? From his stumbling and bumbling words and feet to his deplorable performance as a President, sniffing and kissing and groping children and young women like a dirty old man - the guy is a walking mockery of our country! Yet Chappelle only has Trump jokes when it comes to politics.

"As soon as he [Trump] won they started sayin all that “he’s colluding with Russia he’s colluding with Russia!” It was very embarrassing as a democrat, but as time went on…we all came to learn…he was probably colluding with Russia."

When Chappelle states that Trump was "probably" colluding with Russia, he got lots of laughs and applause from the crowd. That's funny, because to this day there is no proof of that. Chappelle is going off of "accusations" and endless streams of misleading headlines which never yield actual evidence of "Trump/Russia collussion!" In fact Elon Musk recently published information on Twitter revealing that the FBI secretly contacted them ahead of the XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX [HBL] story, warning that it was "Russian disinformation" and was to be sensored ahead of the 2020 election. It has since been revealed that the XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX [HBL] is 100% authentic. So this is a clear case of the "Russia Collusion" narrative being used to cover up the truth. Specifically, regarding the President's bagman/crackhead son!

"Why he got all them documents at his house?…you know what I never stole from work? Work."

First of all, it's never been established that Trump "stole" any documents, so Chappelle is starting right in with a lie. Trump was president and is a prolific business man, having LOTS and LOTS of documents doesn't mean he stole em. And besides, the Presidential Records Act [PRA] gives presidents special privelages with regard to classified documents. So even IF Trump had classified documents at his house, that does not AUTOMATICALLY mean he stole them or that he had no right to be in possession of them! If he had documents MARKED "classified," that doesn't mean they have not been DECLASSIFIED since they were labeled.

Bill Clinton had tons of classified information in his sock drawer years after leaving office. A judge BLOCKED Judicial Watch from forcing him to release the classified materials because she ruled Clinton had the right to classify, declassify, withold, or release the material at his own discretion. But in Trump's case, they simply RAIDED his home and took what they wanted - then accused HIM of breaking the law! Now if they can do that to a former president, imagine what they can do to YOU if they decide YOU are on their "shit list?" Oh, you'll start researching the laws like Sherlock Holmes then!

"President Joe Biden is being reminded of how he criticized Donald Trump as being "irresponsible" for having top secret documents at Mar-a-Lago after the White House revealed classified materials from Biden's time as vice president were discovered at a think tank office." - Newsweek

Interestingly, a story broke just after I first published this blog that Joe Biden basically did exactly what Chappelle is criticizing Trump for doing - but as Vice President! Vice presidents DO NOT have the same authority to keep, classify, or declassify documents. Did the FBI hassle him? Nope. In fact, they are debating whether to even investigate him at all! All the media is doing right now is making excuses for Biden and isn't it interesting that this was "discovered" before the midterms in November but only revealed now? Kinda like how the XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX [HBL] was called "Russian disinformation" before the 2020 election, and was revealed to be authentic AFTER Biden was elected. Hmmm? Chappelle's routines are CLEARLY being informed by the deep state, who are using people like him to manipulate the public perception and keep them in the dark.

This is why sources like Dailymail.com need to make it seem like Chappele went all "rogue" in this routine...Look at how he segues from "Russia collussion" right into "the documents at Mar-A-Lago." Here's the truth about the docs and the "Russia Collusion" that the mainstream media is trying to hide from you and that Chappelle is obviously employed to distract his fans from:

"The whole point of this raid [on Mar-A-Lago by the FBI] was because president Trump declassified the "Crossfire Hurricane" Russian collusion documents through a presidential memo on January 19th 2021 [link at bottom]. The Biden justice department dragged their feet and never PUBLICLY released these documents. Trump had them, [and] they were worried that Trump was going to release them...they know that these documents are very damaging for Obama, Biden, Hillary, the FBI, the intel community...because they SHOW that they "cooked up" the Russia collusion scandal, the Russia collusion HOAX to politically hurt Trump in 2016 and it continued to hurt him when he was the president. And so they had to go get back these documents. That was the purpose of this raid, they went to a biased Judge Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart, they got an illegal general warrant, and they went and got 11,000 documents." - Mike Davis, Article III project

Chappelle continues on politics:

"War in Ukraine brought it all into focus. Lucky for everybody in the western world the Ukrainians are way better fighters than we thought they’d be. God bless em they’re doin good. They killed 10,000 Russians the first week of the war…How is Russia losing to Ukraine?"

And here we are right back on the Biden propaganda train...Have you seen gas prices lately? Rent prices/real estate? Have you seen the disgusting homeless tent communities in our major cities around the country? Have you looked at the murder statistics in Chicago lately? What about nationally? The unprecidented rise in Fentanyl overdoses? Crime in major cities? Healthy young atheletes "dropping dead" for no reason? The absolute chaos, human trafficking, and rampant cartel activity at our southern border? Yet, the Biden administration sends what, $100 Billion to Ukraine so they can defend THEIR BORDERS against one of the great world Nuclear powers? A fight they cannot win, and that pits US against Russia, flirting with a Russia vs USA nuclear conflict [WWIII] in the process! But hey, let's talk about those documents at Mar-A-Lago...

"Now that the mid-terms are over…the whites they’re like, new born babies, just woke up. Everything white people mad about, we been on that. “Man, I can’t feed my family!” Black people like, “man we been on that!” “Man, we can’t trust the government!” “We BEEN on that!” “Man, we should dismantle the FBI!” “Word to MLK we been on that!”

Chappelle started this routine by talking about how you don't mention XXX XXXX ]TJs] without bad things happening. But stereotyping WHITES left and right? That's just fine and hilarious and joke-worthy because FUCK THE WHITES! I mean, is he trying to say that whites have never been poor before? And as for "trusting the government" - Chappelle doesn't seem to have a problem with Joe Biden's government, so where's he "been on that?" MLK? Yeah, obviously a hit job from the inside, but what about JFK? And RFK??? Does he think whites ain't "been on that?" 911: no whites "been on that?"

The FBI raided Trump's home under questionable circumstances and so far have not shown us hard proof of the crime to this day. And Chappelle is basically trying to convince his audience that that's ok because, "we been on that?" Funny, I thought Trump was a "card carrying" member of the Illuminati? Doesn't sound like it by the way the DOJ is treating him and his family. Sounds more like a WITCH HUNT.

And to the "Trump haters" out there...look, if Chappelle lies about the guy, it's not "pro Trump" to call it out. It's PRO TRUTH. Obviously the truth might make Trump look bad in other scenarios, so it works both ways. The truth doesn't care if it makes people look "good" or "bad." But if we're just going to apply it when it suits us, and reject it for the sake of a cheap laugh on SNL - we are living in a self made world of lies ourselves...

As if Operation: Death Con 3 couldn't get any wackier, XX [KW] decides to spend like 3 hours on the Alex Jones show, just days after walking off of the set of Timcast after just 10 minutes or so. He comes out wearing a Balenciaga gimp mask, saying things like "I love the Nazis, and I love XXX XXXX [TJs]." This was really what triggered me to do this particular blog, and I was gonna do part II covering that. But since part I got so few hits, I'm going to wait and see if this was due to lack of interest from my readers or the censors.

This blog was researched, written, and continues to be maintained by 1 person. If you enjoyed it and would like to encourage more of them, donations can be made by clicking the button below.

For sources, go to Part I and scroll to the bottom of the page.

Sunday, January 8, 2023

Operation: Death Con 3 [PT I]

Dave Chappelle

SNL

Drink Champs

[the above headings are to help the search algorithms connect people to this page]

Regarding a recent opening monologue Dave Chappelle did on Saturday Night Live, Dailymail.com published a story on November 14th that "Dave Chappelle kept NBC and the producers of Saturday Night Live guessing up until the last moment when he reportedly performed a new version of his monologue for the live broadcast...The 49-year-old comedian performed a 'fake' version of his monologue for the dress rehearsal earlier on Saturday evening, before doing a different monologue that didn't get anyone's approval for the show that appeared on television, sources told Page Six on Monday."

We really have no way of confirming whether this Dailymail.com article is pulling our leg or not, but a closer look at Chappelle's monologue reveales why it matters. If he said things "without approval" from his scriptwriters/financiers - he'd be culpable for it. But if he did indeed stick to the script, this points the finger at those putting the words in his mouth. And who are "THEY" anyway?

Chappelle starts out reading from a crumpled piece of paper pulled from his pocket, which seems intended to make it appear as though it was some last minute thing he decided to throw in spontaneously. He states in part that "I denounce anti-semetism in all it's forms." Why did he open his monologue this way, even jokingly? The implication seems to be that he is afraid of being branded an "anti-semite," and that he fears the consequences of such a branding.

The statement ends with: "and THAT, Kanye, is how you buy yourself some time..." Time from what? An imminent retaliation from those who believe he is an anti-semite?

"Early in my career I learned that there are 2 words in the English language that you should never say together in sequence. And those words are THE and JEWS. Never heard someone do good after they said that."

If we take the "comedy" out of Chappelle's statement, what's he really saying? Let me translate: "If you are in the entertainment industry, don't talk bad about the Jews, or else..." This indicates to me pretty clearly that Chappelle is straight up enforcing the stereotype that a powerful group of Jews run the entertainment industry and that you better not talk bad about them if you wanna have a career in that field. Isn't that pretty much the same thing Kanye has been saying, albeit less deceptively and with less humor attached? And yet, the politically correct SNL crowd is applauding and laughing along, as if there is nothing at all anti-semetic about Chappelle's routine! Why is it ok for Chappelle to say these things in a comedy routine, but it's "anti-semitic" for YE to say it in other contexts?

"DEFCON is a defense alert state (numbered 1–5) used by the United States Armed Forces." - wiki

"[I] Can’t even remember how it started. Vaguely I remember it started with a Tweet. Strange Tweet…I’m a little sleepy. I’mma get me some rest but when I wake up, I’m gonna go def-con 3 on the Jews!…I was a little worried, “what is he going to do to the jews?”

What does Chappelle mean when he says he can't remember how "it" started? What is "it?" What are we talking about here exactly? Almost sounds like YE and Chappelle are acting out some fake morality battle for the public. If this was some kinda deep state sponsored propaganda campaign, we might call it "Operation: Death Con 3."

To start with, there is no such thing as "Death Con 3." But clearly, Ye was intending to at least partially reference the military Defcon system.

So if Ye is preparing his "Defense readiness condition" against the Jews, doesn't that assume a DEFENSIVE, rather than OFFENSIVE position? Was he anticipating an ATTACK from "the Jews?" To further confuse the matter, he didn't say DEFCON 3, he said DEATH CON 3. We know what "DEATH" is. But a "CON" has to do with deception. If you sell someone a car that you claim runs perfectly, which you know needs a new transmission - that is a CON. Is YE indicating by way of word-play that there is some sort of deception going on?

Ye addressed this "Death Con 3" Tweet recently on a Drink Champs podcast, where he comes off much more toned down, reasonable, and candid than he often does in other contexts. This shows how adept Ye is at "switching gears" with his personality. Or maybe there's something deeper and more sinister going on in his head?

"what I meant to say was “no one’s afraid of the Jewish media mob, which it is"

First of all, Ye quotes his infamous Tweet as saying "Def Con 3," which it didn't - it said DEATH con 3. He tries to play it off like it was a spelling error and that he doesn't always articulate himself as well as he'd like online. Even tells a story about his father giving him advice on how to better articulate himself publicly. I don't buy it, but I highly suggest everyone go watch the entire podcast I am referencing here [link at the bottom] He says a whole lot of interesting things I don't have space to get into here...

Kanye West recently started going by "YE," which is the 2nd half of his original first name. The part he removed is K-A-N. How is that pronounced when you say it? CON.

If you've ever watched the series "Outlander," the Scottish people portrayed in it say "YE" when they mean "YOU." KAN-YE = CON YOU? Removal of the 3 letters K-A-N = the death of Kan or DEATH CON 3?

The fact Kanye cut his name in half tells you he gives his name and each of the letters LOTS of thought. Perhaps even more thought than most would assume...

"I believe 'ye' is the most commonly used word in the Bible, and in the Bible it means 'you,' " West said during an interview with Big Boy in June 2018." - USA Today

Ye's infamous Tweet also stated that he "can't be anti-semetic because Black people are actually Jew." To state that a Jew cannot be anti-semetic makes no sense logically. And the idea that a Black person cannot be anti-semetic because they are all Jews makes even less sense!

Here's another interesting quote from Ye's Drink Champs appearance:

"Hey, you know, my people rise up, they [Jews] did something good, let’s copy what their doin. Let’s rise up the way they rise up...we have to make our own empire. We have to get free just like the Jews did."

He also states at several points that he is jealous of the Jews and what they got, according to him. This all starts to get into a militant sort of Black Power/Black Panther [political party] mentality, which the mainstream has been aggressively promoting for a few years now. But you've gotta question the motives of the mainstream when they act like they wanna EMPOWER a specific group or race of people, while demonizing others who don't fit into that classification. That's not about equality, that's about control and "culling the herd."

"You guys have toyed with me and tried to blackball anyone whoever opposes your agenda"

[Image of a Freemasonic ballot box, taken from freemasonry.network]

"You guys" seems to be a continuation of Ye's suggestion that a group of powerful Jews are behind the entertainment industry, and are actually after Ye himself.

The term "blackball" has a Freemasonic connotation. To "blackball" a candidate means to reject his membership. This is done by casting a black cube, which is an important symbol in ancient Jewish mysticism as well. Is Ye trying to say that he was "rejected" from membership of some elite Freemasonic organization? Sorta falls in line with the "I'm a famous guy rebelling against the elite" narrative. Again, I don't buy it, I think Ye is a stone cold mind control slave for the elite, but I digress...

Back to David's SNL monologue:

"I grew up around Jewish people. I have a lot of Jewish friends, so I’m not freaked out by your culture…I know a little bit about it just from hangin around, be like “yo, let’s go out after school tomorrow!” They be like “we can’t go out it’s Sha Na Na tomorrow!” I be like, what? What is Sha Na Na?"

The joke seems to be that the phrase "Sha Na Na" sounds kinda like a Jewish holiday like Rosh Hashana. But if you watch the video, DAVID Chappelle puts emphesis on the question "what is Sha Na Na?" Sha Na Na was a 50s Rock and Roll revival band who appeared at Woodstock, and later had a TV show which aired from 1977-1981. It's a reference only older people are probably going to get, so I assume it was aimed to grab their specific attention. This kinda sets up the next bit...

[Hasidic Jews]

[Run DMC]

[Weird Al Yankovic, from his video for the song "Amish Paradise," a spoof on Coolio's rap hit "Gangster's Paradise"]

"Why do some of your people dress like RUN DMC?"

The correlation Chappelle makes between RUN DMC's "look" and Hasidic Jewish garb gets a good laugh from the crowd, but is there something much more deeply psychological going on here than it would at first seem?

"A year ago, I’d seen him on a podcast called “drink champs.” Great show…Kanye said “only millionaires wear chains”…he said "I'm a billionare!"...He went on Drink Champs again…he said “I can say anti-semitic things…and Adidas can’t drop me!” Adidas dropped that nigga immediately. Ironically, Adidas was founded by Nazis."

[Slaves in a "Chain Gang"]

[RUN DMC, wearing their signature gold CHAINS...]

[RUN DMC, wearing their signature Adidas shoes, and jumpsuits. One of their most popular songs was "My Adidas."]

Jews, anti-semitism, rappers, chains, adidas, Nazis, money, power, influence - what's the big picture Chappelle is painting here? I think there's something far more psychological happening with the language of his monologue than most people would suspect - and I think it is completely deliberate. The easiest way to break it all down and summarize, is to look at the symbolism here.

In the Thoth tarot deck, we see Adam and Eve [or Adam and Lilith?] after the fall, in the card called "The Devil." They appear to be chained up, so why do they look content? Happy even! The chains are loose, they can take them off anytime. But they PREFER the chains apparently. They PREFER to be satan's slaves? Perhaps they've been deceived into believing the chains are GOOD for them. That they are GOLD. Perhaps these rappers and rockstars and actors that we idolize and adore are all just slaves in a fancier package. Like high end prostitutes, trading in their souls to achieve fame and fortune. Is ANY reward worth trading in your soul for?

[Adolf Dassler, German founder of Adidas in the 1920s]

While the founding of Adidas in Germany seems to pre-date the Nazi party, Chappelle's comment that Adidas was "founded by Nazis" seems to ring somewhat true. In fact, the founder's name was Adolf!

"Both Dassler brothers joined the Nazi Party (NSDAP) in May 1933 and also became members of the National Socialist Motor Corps. Furthermore, Adolf took the rank of Sportwart in the Hitler Youth from 1935 until the end of the war. During the war, the company was running the last sport shoe factory in the country and predominantly supplied the Wehrmacht with shoes." - Wiki

Now obviously RUN DMC was either sponsored by, or were being paid by Adidas to represent them. This not only made Adidas alot of money, but cleared the company's reputation of being "racist" by having Black American rappers and their fans representing them. This may sound like uncomfortable stuff to contemplate, but if you owned a business as large as Adidas, you'd be thinking about this stuff too. Because at the end of the day, it's not about "empowering minorities," it's about MONEY, popularity, and perhaps a bit of social engineering. So yeah, I am not surprised they dropped Ye for his "anti-semitic" comments. It probably had more to do with concerns about how they might be percieved by the PC public, than with Ye's "anti-semitism." Even if they did lose money by dropping him, it's the safe bet in the long run because getting branded an "anti-semitic sympathizer" could sink Adidas in a heartbeat. Cutting Ye off was probably a "better safe than sorry" sort of gamble.

Back to Chappelle's monologue...

"He had broken the show business rules. You know, the rules of perception if they’re black then it’s a gang. If they’re Italian it’s the mob but if they’re Jewish it’s a coincidence and you should never speak about it."

Again, it's kind of odd how obvious Chappelle is here in terms of acknowledging a powerful Jewish presence at the center of the entertainment business. The very same type of observation that got Ye branded "anti-semite." Maybe "the Jews" are writing Chappelle's script here because they WANT people to fear them? Maybe this is why Dailymail.com wants us to believe Chappelle went off script? Because if this is "all Chappelle talking," nobody can be accused of putting words in his mouth...

"I’ve been to Hollywood…It’s ALOT of Jews. Like ALOT. But that don’t mean anything. There’s a lot of black people in Ferguson, Missouri doesn’t mean they run the place…you could maybe adopt the dillusion that the Jews run show business, it’s not a crazy thing to think. But it’s a crazy thing to say out loud in a climate like this."

Allow me to translate David's "joke" here: Powerful Jews run Hollywood, but don't talk about it, if you know what's good for you. Especially you Black people!

[Herschel Walker, speaking at one of Trump's "Save America" rallies]

"Now that mid-terms are over and it’s crazy climate…the most ominous sign of mid-terms I believe would be Herschel Walker who I, I don’t wanna speak badly of because he’s black but I have to admit…he’s observably stupid. Even when he’s not talking his mouth be open a little bit…"

Chappelle says he doesn't wanna speak badly of Herschel Walker because he's black, which is a strange statement as it insinuates that he thinks Blacks should get special treatment over other races - which doesn't contribute to the idea of EQUALITY, it encourages ignorance and INEQUALITY among races. Yet, the PC SNL audience is just applauding and laughing away, as Chappelle disingenuously postures himself as "morally superior" to Kanye West.

"Watching the news now they’re saying it’s the end of the Trump era…He’s what I call an honest liar…I’ve never seen a white male billionaire screaming at the top of his lungs, the whole system is rigged!…he said “I know the system is rigged because I use it” Then he pulled out an Illuminati membership card and chop a line of cocaine with it and did a line right there at the podium."

Chappelle's cheap and seemingly pointless bashing of Herschel Walker, a friend of Donald Trump, was obviously a segue into bashing the latter. Walker was merely a convenient "stepping stone" to get there, and bash one of the few prominent Patriotic Republican Blacks out there while he's at it... Allow me to translate again what Chappelle is saying here: "Trump is part of the deep state but at least he's honest about it and tells it like it is." Some people seemed to think this was a sort of rare compliment coming from someone on the mainstream left. But how is insinuating that Trump is just another member of the White House Illuminati cult a compliment? Methinks David is projecting here...

When it comes to making fun of the Government, Joe Biden is a REAL EASY TARGET. You'd think comedians would be clowning him left and right. Why aren't they? From his stumbling and bumbling words and feet to his deplorable performance as a President, sniffing and kissing and groping children and young women like a dirty old man - the guy is a walking mockery of our country! Yet Chappelle only has Trump jokes when it comes to politics.

"As soon as he [Trump] won they started sayin all that “he’s colluding with Russia he’s colluding with Russia!” It was very embarrassing as a democrat, but as time went on…we all came to learn…he was probably colluding with Russia."

When Chappelle states that Trump was "probably" colluding with Russia, he got lots of laughs and applause from the crowd. That's funny, because to this day there is no proof of that. Chappelle is going off of "accusations" and endless streams of misleading headlines which never yield actual evidence of "Trump/Russia collussion!" In fact Elon Musk recently published information on Twitter revealing that the FBI secretly contacted them ahead of the Hunter Biden Laptop story, warning that it was "Russian disinformation" and was to be sensored ahead of the 2020 election. It has since been revealed that the Hunter Biden laptop is 100% authentic. So this is a clear case of the "Russia Collusion" narrative being used to cover up the truth. Specifically, regarding the President's bagman/crackhead son!

"Why he got all them documents at his house?…you know what I never stole from work? Work."

First of all, it's never been established that Trump "stole" any documents, so Chappelle is starting right in with a lie. Trump was president and is a prolific business man, having LOTS and LOTS of documents doesn't mean he stole em. And besides, the Presidential Records Act [PRA] gives presidents special privelages with regard to classified documents. So even IF Trump had classified documents at his house, that does not AUTOMATICALLY mean he stole them or that he had no right to be in possession of them! If he had documents MARKED "classified," that doesn't mean they have not been DECLASSIFIED since they were labeled.

Bill Clinton had tons of classified information in his sock drawer years after leaving office. A judge BLOCKED Judicial Watch from forcing him to release the classified materials because she ruled Clinton had the right to classify, declassify, withold, or release the material at his own discretion. But in Trump's case, they simply RAIDED his home and took what they wanted - then accused HIM of breaking the law! Now if they can do that to a former president, imagine what they can do to YOU if they decide YOU are on their "shit list?" Oh, you'll start researching the laws like Sherlock Holmes then!

"President Joe Biden is being reminded of how he criticized Donald Trump as being "irresponsible" for having top secret documents at Mar-a-Lago after the White House revealed classified materials from Biden's time as vice president were discovered at a think tank office." - Newsweek

Interestingly, a story broke just after I first published this blog that Joe Biden basically did exactly what Chappelle is criticizing Trump for doing - but as Vice President! Vice presidents DO NOT have the same authority to keep, classify, or declassify documents. Did the FBI hassle him? Nope. In fact, they are debating whether to even investigate him at all! All the media is doing right now is making excuses for Biden and isn't it interesting that this was "discovered" before the midterms in November but only revealed now? Kinda like how the Hunter Biden laptop was called "Russian disinformation" before the 2020 election, and was revealed to be authentic AFTER Biden was elected. Hmmm? Chappelle's routines are CLEARLY being informed by the deep state, who are using people like him to manipulate the public perception and keep them in the dark.

This is why sources like Dailymail.com need to make it seem like Chappele went all "rogue" in this routine...Look at how he segues from "Russia collussion" right into "the documents at Mar-A-Lago." Here's the truth about the docs and the "Russia Collusion" that the mainstream media is trying to hide from you and that Chappelle is obviously employed to distract his fans from:

"The whole point of this raid [on Mar-A-Lago by the FBI] was because president Trump declassified the "Crossfire Hurricane" Russian collusion documents through a presidential memo on January 19th 2021 [link at bottom]. The Biden justice department dragged their feet and never PUBLICLY released these documents. Trump had them, [and] they were worried that Trump was going to release them...they know that these documents are very damaging for Obama, Biden, Hillary, the FBI, the intel community...because they SHOW that they "cooked up" the Russia collusion scandal, the Russia collusion HOAX to politically hurt Trump in 2016 and it continued to hurt him when he was the president. And so they had to go get back these documents. That was the purpose of this raid, they went to a biased Judge Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart, they got an illegal general warrant, and they went and got 11,000 documents." - Mike Davis, Article III project

Chappelle continues on politics:

"War in Ukraine brought it all into focus. Lucky for everybody in the western world the Ukrainians are way better fighters than we thought they’d be. God bless em they’re doin good. They killed 10,000 Russians the first week of the war…How is Russia losing to Ukraine?"

And here we are right back on the Biden propaganda train...Have you seen gas prices lately? Rent prices/real estate? Have you seen the disgusting homeless tent communities in our major cities around the country? Have you looked at the murder statistics in Chicago lately? What about nationally? The unprecidented rise in Fentanyl overdoses? Crime in major cities? Healthy young atheletes "dropping dead" for no reason? The absolute chaos, human trafficking, and rampant cartel activity at our southern border? Yet, the Biden administration sends what, $100 Billion to Ukraine so they can defend THEIR BORDERS against one of the great world Nuclear powers? A fight they cannot win, and that pits US against Russia, flirting with a Russia vs USA nuclear conflict [WWIII] in the process! But hey, let's talk about those documents at Mar-A-Lago...

"Now that the mid-terms are over…the whites they’re like, new born babies, just woke up. Everything white people mad about, we been on that. “Man, I can’t feed my family!” Black people like, “man we been on that!” “Man, we can’t trust the government!” “We BEEN on that!” “Man, we should dismantle the FBI!” “Word to MLK we been on that!”

Chappelle started this routine by talking about how you don't mention THE JEWS without bad things happening. But stereotyping WHITES left and right? That's just fine and hilarious and joke-worthy because FUCK THE WHITES! I mean, is he trying to say that whites have never been poor before? And as for "trusting the government" - Chappelle doesn't seem to have a problem with Joe Biden's government, so where's he "been on that?" MLK? Yeah, obviously a hit job from the inside, but what about JFK? And RFK??? Does he think whites ain't "been on that?" 911: no whites "been on that?"

The FBI raided Trump's home under questionable circumstances and so far have not shown us hard proof of the crime to this day. And Chappelle is basically trying to convince his audience that that's ok because, "we been on that?" Funny, I thought Trump was a "card carrying" member of the Illuminati? Doesn't sound like it by the way the DOJ is treating him and his family. Sounds more like a WITCH HUNT.

And to the "Trump haters" out there...look, if Chappelle lies about the guy, it's not "pro Trump" to call it out. It's PRO TRUTH. Obviously the truth might make Trump look bad in other scenarios, so it works both ways. The truth doesn't care if it makes people look "good" or "bad." But if we're just going to apply it when it suits us, and reject it for the sake of a cheap laugh on SNL - we are living in a self made world of lies ourselves...

As if Operation: Death Con 3 couldn't get any wackier, Ye decides to spend like 3 hours on the Alex Jones show, just days after walking off of the set of Timcast after just 10 minutes or so. He comes out wearing a Balenciaga gimp mask, saying things like "I love the Nazis, and I love the Jews." This was really what triggered me to research this topic, and I'm gonna have to save the rest for part 2.

This blog was researched, written, and continues to be maintained by 1 person. If you enjoyed it and would like to encourage more of them, donations can be made by clicking the button below.

Sources:

Chappelle's SNL monologue
Ye on Drink Champs
Mike Davis Interview
Daily Mail Article
No Trump Collusion - NY Post
Ye on ALex Jones
Timcast commentary on Ye walking off the set
1.19.21 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Joe Biden's Classified Documents Remarks Come Back to Haunt Him

Wednesday, December 14, 2022

Mark Lanegan, Cobain, and other mysteries... [pt 2]

July 20th, 2019 marked the 50th anniversary of man allegedly landing on the moon. I say "allegedly" because I am one of many people who question whether the "moon landing" actually occured the way the public was told and shown. But the point here isn't to argue whether the 1969 moon landing actually happened the way we were told. The point is, there are people with doubts out there. So when signifficant anniversaries like this pop up, the media will often double down on popular narratives which the mainstream is biased towards. This includes new documentaries and tributes which celebrate and RE-ENFORCE the popular narrative. But almost more important is to produce a fresh dose of DEBUNKING material to invalidate theories, evidence, and individuals that are not preferred by the mainstream. It is IMPORTANT to the establishment that you BELIEVE certain things, and not others. And usually the bigger the lie, the more effort is put into re-renforcing it.

[Screenshot taken from hachettebooks.com, who published Lanegan's book]

Although nobody seems to know the exact date Kurt Cobain died [the wiki entry is supposedly based upon the medical examiner's alleged estimate], we know that it was early April of 1994.

Kurt's friend Mark Lanegan recently wrote a memoir "Sing Backwards and Weep," which was released by Hachette books on April 27th of 2021. April of 2021 marked the 27th anniversary month since Kurt Cobain passed away. He was 27 years old when he died. Are these dates just a coincidence or was the release of the book timed to specifically acknowledge the 27th anniversary of Kurt's passing?

In part 1, I included an exclusive interview with Tom Grant, the investigator Courtney Love hired to "find Kurt" when he "went missing" just days before his body was found. I believe Tom Grant to be the most credible source of information regarding Kurt Cobain's death out there. Given that fact, much of what is discussed here is based upon the reliability of Grant's research. I encourage anyone reading this who hasn't, to look into his work over the years at cobaincase.com and decide for yourself if you take his assessments to be credible. Interestingly, one of Tom Grant's biggest critics is Courtney Love's father, Hank Harrison. A man known to be a pathological liar.

One of the first questions I asked Grant had to do with Lanegan's statement in his book that he accompanied Grant and Dylan Carlson to Cobain's house to look for him. While Grant stated he hadn't read the book, I gave him a direct quote which claims “we went from room to room calling his name.” Grant's response was:

[laughing out loud] "No! He was never in that house that was ONLY Dylan and I inside that house."

One can make excuses for Lanegan, but the level of detail given in the book recounting his supposed presence at the Cobain house in this context is far too specific to be an accident or some sort of mistake in recollecting events. Let's review the quotes from Lanegan's book to illustrate what I mean:

“The next day someone in the Nirvana camp asked if I would go with Dylan to some Capital Hill dope houses to see if Kurt was hanging out at any of them…Tom Grant picked us up...we went from place to place, buying drugs and looking for Kurt to no avail…Grant drove us to Kurt’s house near lake Washington. We went from room to room calling his name…I went outside to smoke a cigarette and stood at the bottom of a flight of stairs that led to a small room above his garage...I thought about going up and taking a look. Just then Dylan and Grant walked out, ready to leave…A day or 2 later, Rosemary called me…Kurt’s body had been found…A medical examiner judged his death to have taken place the same day we were at the house looking for him.“

The parts in BOLD lettering above are completely fabricated, according to Tom Grant. Yes, he picked up Lanegan for a few short hours to buy some dope just to see if they could locate Kurt or information about his whereabouts. But Lanegan DID NOT accompany Grant and Dylan to the house. So what you see above appears to be false information planted directly in the middle of what may very well be true information. To me, this shows an intent to mislead people. Why would Lanegan want to mislead people on this topic?

[Screen-shot from Grant's docu-drama "Soaked in Bleach"]

In Tom Grant's film "Soaked in Bleach," his visit to Cobain's house in the middle of a rainy night with Dylan Carlson is one of the first scenes dramatized by actors. Clearly, it is only the 2 of them in the scene, no sign of Mark Lanegan or anyone else anywhere. Grant and Dylan went to the house twice before Kurt's body was found. Both times were at NIGHT and both times it was raining.

Before they try and enter the house, Grant has Dylan go up to the door first, pretending to be alone so that if Kurt answers, he won't be alarmed by Tom Grant's presence - which would remain secret if possible. Dylan takes around 5 minutes or more before reporting back to Grant that nobody is home. At cobaincase.com, Grant remarks that he wondered why Dylan was gone so long, only to come back and say nobody was home. Grant told me that he suspects the reason Dylan was gone so long, is that he checked the greenhouse [room above the garage] and found Kurt's body. Kurt was Dylan's heroin source. And as Lanegan demonstrates in very PAINFUL detail in his book - a junkie's main goal every hour of the day is to make sure they got their junk. And so, Dylan probably panicked and remained silent about finding Kurt's body since Courtney Love was now his main hope for a steady supply of dope, and that abruptly became his main concern.

"Dylan didn't tell me about the room above the garage, and since it was dark and raining, I hadn't noticed it." - Tom Grant, cobaincase.com

Now think about what you just read, in reference to Lanegan's statement in his book. Here is the completely fabricated part of the story Lanegan told again:

"I went outside to smoke a cigarette and stood at the bottom of a flight of stairs that led to a small room above his garage...I thought about going up and taking a look. Just then Dylan and Grant walked out, ready to leave."

Lanegan's brief fabrication here provides an absurd scenario in which both Dylan and Grant overlook the greenhouse in broad daylight, WHILE he stands directly in front of it smoking a cigarette contemplating going in himself. The only purpose of this story as far as I can tell, is to specifically confuse the narrative surrounding the greenhouse - and why Dylan never told Tom Grant to check it. Lanegan even avoids using the word "greenhouse," instead choosing the words "small room above his garage."

Lanegan admits in his book that he lied to the press about whether he'd heard from Kurt or not just before the body was found.

"I'd lied to a Rolling Stone reporter, saying I'd not heard from him for weeks previous to his death..."

So was he really lying when he told Rolling Stone that he hadn't heard from Kurt, or was he telling the truth back then and is changing his story now?

He goes on to state how guilty he felt, that he was some sort of "enabler" of Kurt's drug habit. Even suggesting that his, at the time recently released album "Whiskey for the Holy Ghost," may have encouraged Kurt to feel more suicidal [Lanegan states that Courtney told him Kurt was listening to the album constantly before he died]. While that all may be true, it all happens to enforce the Kurt suicide narrative as well. Does Lanegan's book support the suicide narrative 100% of the time because that's just how things happened? Or was there a specific WILL to lean Lanegan's story in that direction?

"Mark Lanegan, I can tell you for a fact told me that Kurt was NOT suicidal just like Dylan did." - Tom Grant

It's interesting to consider the idea that Lanegan told Tom Grant he did not think that Kurt was suicidal, but then years later writes a book which does nothing but SUPPORT the idea that Kurt was suicidal - albeit somewhat subtly, and with seemingly great care to make it all sound very plausible and honest.

"The crackpot theories that insinuated Courtney and Dylan had conspired to murder Kurt were complete horseshit." - Mark Lanegan

Lanegan doesn't specify where these "crackpot theories" are coming from, but Tom Grant is obviously the loudest, most credible voice out there contributing to the idea that Kurt was murdered. But Grant NEVER claimed or insinuated that Dylan Carlson was involved with Kurt's murder. He has insinuated that Dylan likely discovered Kurt's body days before it was "official" without saying anything - but that's not the same as accusing him of being directly involved. In his book, Lanegan seems to be conflating the "Courtney had Kurt murdered" theory with some alleged "Courtney and Dylan conspired to murder Kurt" theory - in order to render any considerations along these lines absurd.

In Lanegan's book he credits Courtney Love for paying the cost to put him in the M.A.P. rehab facility, which he seems to think saved his life. That may be 100% true. But given Courtney's manipulative reputation, I asked Tom Grant if he thought there may have been an alterior motive for her doing that. Here is his response:

"There’s always an alterior motive for everything that Courtney does. I never even heard that she did that. It wouldn’t surprise me if that’s true because I think Courtney needs a team of people around her…that will help support her in the fact that Kurt was suicidal...Courtney may have started telling him, “I want you to say this I want you to say that, I want you to plant this story in the press, say this in your book” whatever…"

According to Tom Grant, Hole bassist Kristen Pfaff "wanted to get away from Courtney. I know that for a fact because I know her family pretty well." She ended up dead within a couple months of Kurt dying. It was officially ruled an overdose. Lanegan tells a short tale about planning a date with Pfaff just before she ended up dead. A tragic tale with seemingly no purpose. Unless that purpose was merely to innoculate any conspiracy theories regarding her death? Again, anything to do with Courtney in his book always leans TOWARDS her innocence of any possible wrong-doing. If Lanegan didn't think Pfaff's death was fishy, why should we?

Whether Lanegan deliberately intended to mislead people regarding Kurt Cobain's death in his book, I cannot say for certain. But the intent behind certain specific lies in it seems self-evident to me. Or maybe it was not necessarily HIS intent, but the financiers he was beholden to?

[L: Josh Homme R: Jesse Hughes - founders of the band The Eagles of Death Metal]

LANEGAN - HATCHETTE - LEGARDERE - LE BATACLAN - JOSH HOMME

Back in 2017 I published a blog on the 2015 Le Bataclan massacre.These terrorist attacks in Paris have been attributed to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). About 90 rock fans were slaughtered at the famous Le Bataclan, the most ever killed at a rock concert to my knowledge. The band playing on stage when the attacks began was The Eagles of Death Metal, who were founded by Jesse Hughes and Josh Homme. Josh Homme was a friend and former bandmate of Mark Lanegan.

According to a New York times interview, Homme had planned to be onstage at that show but changed his plans. “I wasn’t there by a stroke of fate,” he said. In that article, there is no particular explanation as to what this "stroke of fate" was. Now to be fair, Homme didn't always perform with EODM - but one would think he'd want to very clearly explain why he wasn't present for this particular show, just to assure the more "conspiracy minded" people that he didn't have some kind of "heads up" as to what would occur there. People like his own band mate, Jesse Hughes.

"Hughes said he felt something was amiss when he first arrived at the venue and noted the security guard for the backstage area didn't look at him. "I immediately went to the promoter and said, 'Who's that guy? I want to put another dude on,'" Hughes claimed. "And he goes, 'Well some of the other guards aren’t here yet,' and eventually I found out that six or so wouldn't show up at all...It seems rather obvious that they had a reason not to show up." - Rolling Stone

Joel and Pascal Laloux owned Bataclan since 1976. They sold it on Sept 11th 2015, 2 months before the terrorist attacks...Lagardère Sports and Entertainment bought 70% of the Bataclan company from its owners...The Largest shareholder to the Lagardere group is the Qatar, a known financier of the Muslim brotherhood, and has long been suspected of funding ISIS/ISIL...This was exposed towards the end of 2016 [wikileakes] and reads in part that Qatar and Saudi Arabia were “providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL.”

"Because of our position in the music industry, we have direct ties to what has happened in France: Eagles of Death Metal are one of our own artists; Bataclan is owned by one of our shareholders, Lagardère group; one of our own family members, who is also an artist manager, has worked with victim Nick Alexander on tour" By Bandsintown - Nov 16, 2015

I've gathered this information here, mostly just to keep public record of it out in the open - for possible further use in connecting dots in the future. For now, I am not claiming that these financial connections [by way of Lagardère] between the publisher of Mark Lanegan's book, Le Bataclan, and The Eagles of Death Metal means anything in particular - other than the fact that those funding terrorist organizations appear to also be funding our American media to a large degree. But while we are discussing connections, let's take a closer look at what Lanegan said about Josh Homme in his book.

Mark Lanegan met Josh Homme when he briefly joined the Screaming Trees on guitar. Homme would later invite Lanegan to tour with his band, Queens of the Stoneage.

In his book, Lanegan describes how the two of them connected - which seems a bit odd considering he was a full blown heroin junky while Homme was straight. Nevertheless, Homme decides to join Lanegan in one of his late night searches for heroin in the worst neighborhood they can find in whatever town they happened to be touring that particular night. But Lanegan fails to "score" because the drug dealers they meet are convinced Homme is an undercover cop during 2 different encounters. I found that detail very interesting because in my blog on the Bataclan massacre I observed, perhaps incorrectly, that the EODM seemed to be some sort of corporate sponsored propaganda vehicle. I also hinted at my suspicion that Homme himself might be some sort of agent provocateur. I am not claiming that Lanegan's book is any sort of vindication of my suspicions, but that it seems to directly address any suspicions his fans may have along those lines - and ever so subtly debunks them. We're supposed to think, "Lanegan trusted Homme enough to take him on a score! People thought he was an undercover - but Lanegan didn't, so you shouldn't either because you love and trust Lanegan, RIGHT?"

[Tuesday Cross (Marina Cardenas) and Jesse Hughes (singer in EODM)]

[Lanegan, while being interviewed at his home residence in 2019]

[Tuesday Cross has a crucifix tattoo'd on both middle fingers, and has an upside-down cross motif tatoo'd directly at the top/center of her chest. Mark Lanegan had a similar tattoo on the back of his hand.]

"The front cover's a picture of the doorknocker on my studio...we got it from some place and the guy said "I have to tell you that this thing supposedly is cursed..." So we bought it immediately [laughter] Cursed? Fuck yeah!..if anything's cursed, we're definately in the market for it..." - Mark Lanegan, 2019 interview

CLICK HERE FOR PART 1

This blog was researched, written, and continues to be maintained by 1 person. If you enjoyed it and would like to encourage more of them, donations can be made by clicking the button below.

You might also be interested in my blog on Andrew Wood